Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SUN Chloe | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 51% | |
2 | TSIMIKLIS aphrodite | - | - | - | 7% | 35% | 58% | |
3 | LIU Enjia sherry | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
3 | ZOU Ella | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 45% |
5 | FENG Grace | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 30% | 64% |
6 | HARRIS Julia | - | - | 1% | 12% | 60% | 27% | |
7 | LUO Miranda | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 26% |
8 | DUAN Sophie | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 42% | |
9 | BROWN Lola | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 24% |
10 | HAN Gian | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 16% |
11 | FIELD Elizabeth | - | - | - | 1% | 20% | 78% | |
12 | TAO Ann | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
13 | SIROTA Francis | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% | |
14 | ZHANG Gwenyth | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | |
15 | WANG Amabel | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% | |
16 | MCFARLANE Asha | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 47% | 7% | |
17 | BING Charlotte | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
18 | ORRINGER Lottie | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% | |
19 | CHAN Ella | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
20 | LIN Yunong | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
21 | MARTIN Sloan | - | 2% | 14% | 39% | 37% | 9% | |
22 | CULLIVAN Sienna | - | - | - | 3% | 36% | 62% | |
23 | KIM Sydney | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 28% | 5% | |
24 | CASHMAN Hailey | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
25 | LI Olivia | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
26 | CHAN Mila | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
27 | VENZON Makena Jane | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - | |
28 | MIYASHIRO Katelyn | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 33% | 7% | |
29 | MCSHERRY Kayla | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 35% | 10% | |
30 | LIU Ariana | 2% | 17% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
31 | HAN Mia | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
32 | SALMI-BYDALEK Ada | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
33 | WANG Joanna | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
34 | WANG DINA C. | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 40% | 13% | |
35 | WOODLEY Isabella | - | 2% | 13% | 38% | 39% | 9% | |
36 | THERON Zoe | - | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
37 | WU Elynna | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
37 | FEDER Acadia | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
39 | EYER Brooke | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 15% | |
40 | ZEE Savannah | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 8% | - | |
40 | LI savannah | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 27% | 4% | |
42 | LUCAS Ava | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
43 | DENG Claire | 25% | 51% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
44 | MUMMANENI Samyuta | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
45 | ZAHRAN Emily | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
46 | OS Danielle | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
47 | ZHANG Zoey | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
48 | ZHANG Constance | - | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 5% | - |
49 | UHLIG Natalie | 5% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 4% | - | |
50 | BO Iris | 21% | 44% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
51 | HOM Avery | 15% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
52 | LI Alice | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | - | - | |
53 | TULYAG Sayda | 3% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
54 | LIN isabella | - | 4% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 4% | |
55 | LI Joy | 25% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
56 | FRASER Morgan | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 7% | |
57 | RAFFAELE Nancy | 2% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
58 | BOIKE Lucille | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
59 | DE CASTRO Kai | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
60 | KIM Sophia | 2% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
61 | WU Allison | 4% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
62 | LI Doreen | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - | |
63 | MORTENSEN Carissa | < 1% | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 3% | |
64 | SAIFEE Zahra | 42% | 44% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
65 | HUSSAIN Maya | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
66 | GOITIA Genevieve | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
67 | LIN Katrina | - | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
68 | WANG Doreen | 13% | 41% | 35% | 10% | - | - | |
69 | YU Sophie | 5% | 26% | 43% | 24% | 2% | - | |
70 | SHUSTA Lily | 3% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
71 | BAULIN Zoya | 3% | 22% | 44% | 28% | 3% | - | |
72 | HUGHES Olivia | 14% | 43% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
73 | ZOLDAN Nolabelle | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
74 | CHANG Lydia | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
75 | HAFEZ Sahar | 1% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
75 | LEE Zoe | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
77 | BEHL Alessandra | 13% | 38% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
78 | LIU Angelina | 16% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
79 | YIN Chloe | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
80 | KOSCIK-AQUINO Emily | 1% | 11% | 37% | 37% | 13% | 1% | |
81 | LLOYD Bianca | 11% | 37% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | |
82 | OSMINKINA-JONES Kai | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 33% | 14% | 1% |
83 | KNAPP Isabella | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 7% | - |
84 | HUANG Natalie | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 4% |
85 | WONG charlotte | 48% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
86 | RAUCH Iris | 20% | 43% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
87 | LING Camryn | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | - | |
88 | KIM Alison | 9% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | |
89 | LISKA Sofia | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
90 | HOM Emma | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
90 | LI Emma Jing | 36% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
92 | DUVVA Sanika | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
93 | CHIN Riley | 63% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
94 | WANG Christina | 76% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
95 | TEPMAN Zoey | 33% | 42% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
95 | LIN Zhishan | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.