USA Fencing National Championships & July Challenge

Y-10 Women's Foil

Monday, July 11, 2022 at 8:00 AM

Minneapolis, MN, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 SUN Chloe - - 1% 9% 39% 51%
2 TSIMIKLIS aphrodite - - - 7% 35% 58%
3 LIU Enjia sherry - - - - 5% 30% 65%
3 ZOU Ella - - - 2% 13% 39% 45%
5 FENG Grace - - - 1% 6% 30% 64%
6 HARRIS Julia - - 1% 12% 60% 27%
7 LUO Miranda - - 1% 7% 24% 41% 26%
8 DUAN Sophie - - 2% 15% 42% 42%
9 BROWN Lola - - 1% 7% 26% 43% 24%
10 HAN Gian - - 3% 14% 32% 36% 16%
11 FIELD Elizabeth - - - 1% 20% 78%
12 TAO Ann - 1% 7% 24% 38% 25% 5%
13 SIROTA Francis - - 1% 9% 37% 53%
14 ZHANG Gwenyth 1% 8% 23% 35% 26% 8%
15 WANG Amabel - - 3% 16% 42% 39%
16 MCFARLANE Asha - 1% 10% 35% 47% 7%
17 BING Charlotte 2% 13% 31% 34% 17% 3%
18 ORRINGER Lottie - - 5% 24% 44% 27%
19 CHAN Ella 5% 20% 34% 28% 12% 2% -
20 LIN Yunong 3% 18% 37% 31% 10% 1%
21 MARTIN Sloan - 2% 14% 39% 37% 9%
22 CULLIVAN Sienna - - - 3% 36% 62%
23 KIM Sydney - 4% 20% 42% 28% 5%
24 CASHMAN Hailey - 1% 5% 20% 36% 29% 8%
25 LI Olivia - 2% 11% 29% 36% 19% 3%
26 CHAN Mila - 4% 18% 33% 30% 13% 2%
27 VENZON Makena Jane 10% 32% 37% 18% 3% -
28 MIYASHIRO Katelyn - 3% 18% 39% 33% 7%
29 MCSHERRY Kayla - 3% 16% 36% 35% 10%
30 LIU Ariana 2% 17% 39% 31% 10% 1%
31 HAN Mia - 2% 11% 28% 34% 20% 4%
32 SALMI-BYDALEK Ada - 3% 15% 33% 33% 14% 2%
33 WANG Joanna 1% 9% 29% 36% 21% 5% -
34 WANG DINA C. - 2% 12% 33% 40% 13%
35 WOODLEY Isabella - 2% 13% 38% 39% 9%
36 THERON Zoe - 8% 27% 36% 22% 5% -
37 WU Elynna 3% 14% 30% 32% 17% 4% -
37 FEDER Acadia 2% 13% 31% 33% 17% 4% -
39 EYER Brooke - 1% 10% 33% 40% 15%
40 ZEE Savannah 3% 18% 39% 32% 8% -
40 LI savannah - 4% 21% 43% 27% 4%
42 LUCAS Ava 12% 35% 35% 15% 3% -
43 DENG Claire 25% 51% 20% 3% - -
44 MUMMANENI Samyuta - - 2% 12% 33% 38% 15%
45 ZAHRAN Emily - 4% 17% 33% 30% 13% 2%
46 OS Danielle - 3% 15% 32% 32% 15% 3%
47 ZHANG Zoey 2% 15% 34% 32% 14% 3% -
48 ZHANG Constance - 7% 27% 37% 23% 5% -
49 UHLIG Natalie 5% 25% 41% 25% 4% -
50 BO Iris 21% 44% 28% 6% 1% -
51 HOM Avery 15% 40% 33% 10% 1% -
52 LI Alice 25% 43% 25% 6% - -
53 TULYAG Sayda 3% 19% 37% 31% 10% 1%
54 LIN isabella - 4% 25% 42% 24% 4%
55 LI Joy 25% 41% 25% 7% 1% -
56 FRASER Morgan - 4% 21% 40% 28% 7%
57 RAFFAELE Nancy 2% 21% 40% 28% 8% 1% -
58 BOIKE Lucille - 2% 13% 30% 34% 18% 3%
59 DE CASTRO Kai 6% 23% 35% 26% 9% 1% -
60 KIM Sophia 2% 21% 37% 28% 10% 2% -
61 WU Allison 4% 28% 40% 22% 5% 1% -
62 LI Doreen 13% 38% 35% 12% 1% -
63 MORTENSEN Carissa < 1% 11% 33% 36% 16% 3%
64 SAIFEE Zahra 42% 44% 13% 1% - -
65 HUSSAIN Maya - 2% 14% 32% 34% 15% 2%
66 GOITIA Genevieve 8% 30% 37% 20% 5% 1% -
67 LIN Katrina - 5% 23% 37% 26% 7% 1%
68 WANG Doreen 13% 41% 35% 10% - -
69 YU Sophie 5% 26% 43% 24% 2% -
70 SHUSTA Lily 3% 18% 33% 30% 13% 2%
71 BAULIN Zoya 3% 22% 44% 28% 3% -
72 HUGHES Olivia 14% 43% 32% 10% 1% -
73 ZOLDAN Nolabelle 1% 5% 19% 35% 30% 10%
74 CHANG Lydia 1% 8% 25% 35% 23% 7% 1%
75 HAFEZ Sahar 1% 15% 34% 33% 14% 3% -
75 LEE Zoe 6% 23% 34% 25% 10% 2% -
77 BEHL Alessandra 13% 38% 34% 13% 2% - -
78 LIU Angelina 16% 38% 32% 11% 2% -
79 YIN Chloe 35% 42% 19% 4% - -
80 KOSCIK-AQUINO Emily 1% 11% 37% 37% 13% 1%
81 LLOYD Bianca 11% 37% 38% 13% 2% -
82 OSMINKINA-JONES Kai - 4% 16% 32% 33% 14% 1%
83 KNAPP Isabella 1% 10% 26% 34% 23% 7% -
84 HUANG Natalie - 1% 7% 24% 38% 26% 4%
85 WONG charlotte 48% 41% 10% 1% - -
86 RAUCH Iris 20% 43% 30% 7% 1% -
87 LING Camryn 6% 27% 38% 22% 6% -
88 KIM Alison 9% 33% 39% 17% 3% -
89 LISKA Sofia 2% 13% 34% 36% 14% 2%
90 HOM Emma 31% 44% 21% 4% - -
90 LI Emma Jing 36% 44% 18% 3% - -
92 DUVVA Sanika 31% 42% 21% 5% 1% - -
93 CHIN Riley 63% 31% 5% - - - -
94 WANG Christina 76% 21% 2% - - - -
95 TEPMAN Zoey 33% 42% 20% 5% 1% - -
95 LIN Zhishan 73% 24% 3% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.