Richard F Oles Memorial Charm City Classic Div 1A ROC

Div I-A Men's Épée

Sunday, December 9, 2018 at 8:00 AM

Catonsville, MD - Catonsville, MD, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 CAMPBELL Daniel R. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 45%
2 LEE Timothy S. 100% 100% 99% 90% 64% 29% 6%
3 SNYDER IV William B. 100% 100% 99% 91% 67% 31% 6%
3 YI Kyle 100% 100% 93% 70% 33% 8% 1%
5 HOFFMANN Christopher J. 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 50% 12%
6 KIM Derek D. 100% 100% 98% 85% 53% 19% 3%
7 SCHWARTZ Elliott 100% 100% 98% 83% 49% 16% 2%
8 KIM Ethan S. 100% 100% 100% 96% 81% 47% 13%
9 SIELING Eric A. 100% 100% 100% 95% 75% 38% 9%
10 LEE Woosuk 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 34%
11 YOON Nathan 100% 98% 86% 58% 24% 5% -
12 DAVIS Jeffrey H. 100% 100% 98% 89% 65% 31% 7%
13 ADOLPHE Benjamin S. 100% 100% 97% 83% 53% 21% 4%
14 ECKERT Kevin M. 100% 100% 99% 91% 67% 32% 7%
15 CHEN Wesley 100% 98% 87% 57% 24% 5% -
16 TAE William G. 100% 100% 99% 90% 67% 33% 7%
17 HITCHCOCK David 100% 100% 100% 96% 81% 46% 12%
18 TIRRELL Justin J. 100% 100% 96% 80% 47% 16% 2%
19 LIU John 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 61% 21%
20 DOAN Joseph M. 100% 100% 97% 83% 51% 17% 2%
21 YOON Sungho 100% 100% 96% 80% 46% 15% 2%
22 RINEHART Conner M. 100% 100% 97% 83% 54% 20% 3%
23 KIM Dohyun D. 100% 99% 93% 67% 29% 6% -
24 TRAIN TIMOTHY 100% 100% 99% 91% 69% 35% 8%
25 BOWERMAN Lucas A. 100% 100% 100% 96% 81% 48% 14%
26 PLUMER Jack E. 100% 98% 88% 61% 27% 6% 1%
27 SIMMS David 100% 96% 78% 46% 16% 3% -
28 TRAN Dai Long 100% 95% 73% 40% 14% 3% -
29 ADLER Ethan M. 100% 100% 96% 81% 50% 19% 3%
30 CHAWLA Armaan 100% 92% 64% 28% 6% 1% -
31 MITCHUM Drew J 100% 98% 86% 55% 20% 4% -
32 SALISBURY Cary 100% 98% 86% 56% 23% 5% -
33 WALTHER Bryan M. 100% 94% 72% 37% 11% 2% -
34 SOZANSKI Kyle S. 100% 95% 74% 41% 14% 3% -
35 PICCUS Isaac S. 100% 100% 95% 78% 46% 16% 2%
36 EVANS Allen L. 100% 98% 88% 60% 27% 6% -
37 NOMANI Shibli D. 100% 99% 89% 61% 26% 5% -
38 DESAMOURS Georges H. 100% 100% 99% 91% 63% 25% 4%
39 BENKLER Yuriy 100% 95% 71% 35% 10% 1% -
40 MARKAS Justin W. 100% 100% 96% 79% 46% 16% 2%
41 RODRIGUEZ Ryan 100% 84% 48% 16% 3% - -
42 SIMMS Daniel 100% 97% 82% 48% 16% 2% -
43 ROY NATHAN J 100% 99% 93% 73% 41% 13% 2%
44 STEVENS Daniel 100% 100% 95% 75% 39% 11% 1%
45 LI Benjamin 100% 71% 28% 6% 1% - -
46 DUDLEY Logan M. 100% 93% 67% 32% 9% 1% -
47 KIM Brad K. 100% 88% 51% 17% 3% - -
48 ERDEK Michael 100% 98% 88% 61% 27% 6% 1%
49 CAMMETT William J. 100% 90% 60% 25% 6% 1% -
50 ZHENG Yuanlong (Bill) 100% 88% 55% 21% 4% - -
51 DE KLERK Ryan 100% 84% 43% 11% 1% - -
52 SNYDER John W. 100% 93% 67% 32% 8% 1% -
53 HODGE Jaydon L. 100% 64% 21% 3% - - -
54 BRAVO Drake X. 100% 92% 65% 30% 8% 1% -
55 SHETE Smit 100% 87% 48% 14% 2% - -
55 HERMAN Nathan 100% 89% 55% 19% 3% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.