Jersey City, NJ - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MAURER Ned E. | V D V V V D | V V V V V | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 2 | MARSHALL Ian | V D V V V D | V V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 3 | HEALY Griffen | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 3 | MA Alexander | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 5 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | V V V V D V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 6 | MANGE Nathan | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 7 | VANNI Filippo A. | V D V V V | V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 8 | FERRARO Peter M. | D V D D V | V V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 9 | GAEHDE Christian P. | V D V V V V | V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 10 | WANG Michael | D V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 11 | SOUMAKIS Sarantos G. | V D V V V | V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 12 | TSANG Matthew K. | D V V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 13 | BREIER Matthew F. | V V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 14 | ONIK Elijah T. | D V V D V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 15 | ASCIONED'ELIA Adam I. | V V D D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 16 | PYO Michael M. | D D D D D | V V D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 17 | KAZA Nitish | V V V D V V | D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 18 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | D V V V V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 19 | BOISLARD Adam J. | V V D V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 20 | MEYERS Lee P. | V V V D V D | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 21 | OZSOLAK Alex | D V V V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 22 | BRYANT Max | V V D V D D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 23 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | V D D D V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 24 | AMRANI David | D D V D V V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 25 | KWON Ethan | V V V D D D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 26 | CARMAN Ian K. | D V V D D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 27 | TSIMBINOS Thomas R. | V D D D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 28 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | D D V V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 29 | XIE Javah | D V D D D V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 30 | BELLUOMO David C. | D D D V V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 31 | BAE Kevin | D D D V D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 32 | KIZHNER Fillip | D D D D V | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 33 | ENGEL Henry R. | D V D D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 34 | WERWA Griffith | V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 35 | CUSICK Matthew K. | D D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 36 | SANTULLI Tristan | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 37 | WANG Gerald Y. | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 39 | TOMRUK Batu | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.