Jersey City, NJ - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MAURER Ned E. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% |
2 | MARSHALL Ian | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
3 | HEALY Griffen | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% | |
3 | MA Alexander | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 64% | |
5 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
6 | MANGE Nathan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 20% |
7 | VANNI Filippo A. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% | |
8 | FERRARO Peter M. | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
9 | GAEHDE Christian P. | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
10 | WANG Michael | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
11 | SOUMAKIS Sarantos G. | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
12 | TSANG Matthew K. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
13 | BREIER Matthew F. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
14 | ONIK Elijah T. | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 41% | 20% | 3% |
15 | ASCIONED'ELIA Adam I. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 2% | |
16 | PYO Michael M. | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | |
17 | KAZA Nitish | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 46% | 18% |
18 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 1% | 8% | 30% | 41% | 18% | 2% | |
19 | BOISLARD Adam J. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 6% | |
20 | MEYERS Lee P. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
21 | OZSOLAK Alex | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
22 | BRYANT Max | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
23 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | - | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
24 | AMRANI David | 3% | 29% | 42% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
25 | KWON Ethan | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
26 | CARMAN Ian K. | - | 4% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | |
27 | TSIMBINOS Thomas R. | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
28 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 4% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | - | |
29 | XIE Javah | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
30 | BELLUOMO David C. | 2% | 26% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
31 | BAE Kevin | 8% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
32 | KIZHNER Fillip | 17% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - | |
33 | ENGEL Henry R. | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
34 | WERWA Griffith | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
35 | CUSICK Matthew K. | 18% | 37% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
36 | SANTULLI Tristan | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
37 | WANG Gerald Y. | 11% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
39 | TOMRUK Batu | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.