Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center - Atlanta, GA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ZHU Charlie | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 2 | ARDOIN Cameron | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 3 | HARDISON Terry (Reno) | V V V V | V V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 3 | DELARUE Nelson Y. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 5 | AN Damon | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 6 | SILVA Daniel | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 7 | JARDIM Kyle A. | V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 9 | SEOL Kyung | V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 10 | BURLESON Aidan J. | V V V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 11 | GRAHAM Ian | V D V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 12 | NORTON Benjamin | V V V D V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 14 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU Alexandra | V D V V V D | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 15 | BALLOU Johnathan | D D V V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 16 | THACKERAY Caden | D V V D | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 17 | BOWMAN Tamara E. | V D V V V V | D | 1.0 | 5 | +4.0 |
| 18 | QI Parker | D V V V V V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 19 | CROWLEY James | D V V D V V | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 20 | JAYASANKAR Hari | V V D D V V | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 21 | BRUNER Thomas | D V V D V V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 21 | HAGEN Samuel | V D V V D V | 4.0 | 4 | - | |
| 23 | MUSSELMAN Matthew | V D D V V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 24 | VAN NIMWEGEN Nicholas | D V D V V D | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 25 | TRUBEY Elise | V V D D D V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 26 | ORLOFSKY Sydney | D V V D V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 27 | WOLF Gabriel | V D D V V D | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 28 | GIBBS Mason | V D V V D D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 29 | SHANKWILER Christopher | D V V D D V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 30 | CHRISTY Alex | D D V V V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 31 | PROUDNIK Anthony | V D D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 32 | HARKONEN Eemil | V D D V D | V D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 33 | MERRIMAN Morgan | V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 34 | BELL Liam | V D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 35 | AVIDANO Mason | D V V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 36 | RYAN Alyssa | D V V D D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 37 | NAWAZ Taimoor | V D D D V D | D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 38 | MCCLURE Morgan | V V D D D D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 | |
| 39 | SCHIPPER Bonnie | D V D D D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 | |
| 40 | RUCK VEGA Alejandro | D D D D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 | |
| 41 | ALEXANDER Xander | D D D D V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 | |
| 42 | STRAW Miles | D V D D D D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 | |
| 43 | WEAVER Charles | D D V D D D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 | |
| 44 | PRUITT Jadie | D D D D D V | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 | |
| 45 | BRUCE Naomi | D D D D D V | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 | |
| 46 | BRANNER Christian | D D D D D D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 | |
| 46 | CROSS Phoenix | D D D D D D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 | |
| 48 | HARPER Rebecca | D D D D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 | |
| 48 | ADAMSON Garren | D D D D D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 | |
| 50 | SHAFER Genine | D D D D D D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 | |
| 52 | STEWART Madeline | D D D D D D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 | |
| 53 | MEYERS Lucas | D D D D D D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 | |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.