The Fencing Center of San Jose - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | HEDGES Philip S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% |
| 2 | ZAYDMAN David M. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 4% |
| 3 | WILKENS Zach Q. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% |
| 3 | WELDON Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 20% |
| 5 | AHMED Saheer | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 19% | 1% |
| 6 | MARIANI Lou | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
| 7 | WATT Darren | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 13% | - |
| 8 | DOWDELL Riley | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 16% | 2% |
| 9 | LOGUE Ethan D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% |
| 10 | ULINICH Alexander | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 32% | 4% |
| 11 | KIM Benjamin I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
| 12 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 31% | 4% |
| 13 | NG Biwon | 100% | 92% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 14 | COHEN Benjamin A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 20% |
| 15 | DUONG Zoey | 100% | 91% | 56% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 16 | WHEELER Mark C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% |
| 17 | HELGE James R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 31% |
| 18 | TONG Samuel | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 19 | SARKAR Anish | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 45% | 7% |
| 20 | YUKELSON Michael | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 18% | 2% |
| 21 | KELLEY Thomas (TJ) J. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 11% | - |
| 22 | KUO Michael | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 23 | KONG Martin C. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 24 | PRAKASH Hari | 100% | 96% | 73% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 25 | BECK Brian C. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% |
| 26 | CHANG Celine A. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 27 | HOFMAN Haejung | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% | 1% |
| 28 | KUO Rylan | 100% | 81% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 29 | SIRBU Dan | 100% | 92% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 30 | HOOPES Jr. Richard R. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | PERGERSON Cole | 100% | 98% | 72% | 25% | 3% | - |
| 32 | ENRILE Erica | 100% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | GU Aidan | 100% | 84% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 34 | CHENG Zijun | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 35 | LOGUE Andrew E. | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | MADRID Maureen | 100% | 64% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.