2025-2026 | 2024-2025 | 2023-2024 | 2022-2023 | Before 2022 | All Time | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Victories | 5 | 2 | - | - | - | 7 |
Losses | 1 | 15 | - | - | - | 16 |
Win Ratio | 83.3% | 11.8% | - | - | - | 30.4% |
Pool Victories | 5 | 2 | - | - | - | 7 |
Pool Losses | - | 13 | - | - | - | 13 |
Pool Win Ratio | 100.0% | 13.3% | - | - | - | 35.0% |
DE Victories | - | - | - | - | - | - |
DE Losses | 1 | 2 | - | - | - | 3 |
DE Win Ratio | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | - | - | 0.0% |
Note: Seasons start on August 1st and end on July 31st.
2025-2026 | 2024-2025 | 2023-2024 | 2022-2023 | Before 2022 | All Time | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Easy wins† | 3 | - | - | - | - | 3 |
Easy wins as % of wins | 60.0% | 0.0% | - | - | - | 42.9% |
Close wins‡ | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | 2 |
Close wins as % of all wins | 20.0% | 50.0% | - | - | - | 28.6% |
Close losses‡ | - | 3 | - | - | - | 3 |
Close losses as % of all losses | 0.0% | 20.0% | - | - | - | 18.8% |
Big losses† | 1 | 8 | - | - | - | 9 |
Big losses as % of all losses | 100.0% | 53.3% | - | - | - | 56.2% |
† Easy victories or big losses are those with the score difference of 4 or more touches in a pool, 7 or
more touches in direct elimination, and 5 or more in veteran and youth direct elimination.
‡ Close bouts are those with the score difference of 1 or fewer touches in a pool, 3 or
fewer touches in direct elimination, or 2 or fewer touches in veteran or youth direct elimination.
2025-2026 | 2024-2025 | 2023-2024 | 2022-2023 | Before 2022 | All Time | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Victories | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
Victories as % of all victories | 20.0% | 0.0% | - | - | - | 14.3% |
Losses | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Losses as % of all losses | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | - | - | 0.0% |
Total | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
Total as % of all bouts | 16.7% | 0.0% | - | - | - | 4.3% |
2025-2026 | 2024-2025 | 2023-2024 | 2022-2023 | Before 2022 | All Time | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Events | 1 | 3 | - | - | - | 4 |
Tournaments | 1 | 2 | - | - | - | 3 |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | V | 5:1 | MENG Daniel | 23 | U | 17 | Golubitsky Fencing Center | 94 | 1 | 69.3 | 44% | ||
Pool | V | 4:3 | LU Nathan | 1 | U | 18 | Silicon Valley Fencing Center | 201 | 70 | 66.4 | 42% | ||
Pool | V | 5:2 | SURENDRA Nivan | 9 | U | 3 | Silicon Valley Fencing Center | 611 | 136 | 86.0 | 23% | ||
Pool | V | 5:1 | FOO Preston | 17 | U | 22 | Socal Fencing Center | 473 | 222 | 58.8 | 36% | ||
Pool | V | 5:1 | ZHONG Jasper | 24 | U | 20 | Socal Fencing Center | 208 | 281 | 41.8 | 54% | ||
T16 | D | 3:10 | HO Karsten | 6 | U | 8 | Prime Fencing Academy | 1526 | 973 | 120.1 | 26% |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | D | 0:5 | QIN Evan | 15 | U | 1 | LA International Fencing Center | ||||||
Pool | D | 4:5 | LIU Jordan | 3 | U | 12 | Golubitsky Fencing Center | 853 | 92 | 20.9 | 12% | ||
Pool | D | 1:5 | TROYANKER Makar | 14 | U | 5 | LA International Fencing Center | 928 | 71 | 15.8 | 9% | ||
Pool | D | 4:5 | CHEN Ian | 9 | U | 10 | Socal Fencing Center | 201 | 55 | 54.8 | 41% | ||
T16 | D | 1:10 | MENG Eric | 2 | U | 3 | Golubitsky Fencing Center | 1325 | 1283 | 309.9 | 48% |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | D | 3:5 | CHANG Hayden | 14 | U | 5 | LAIFC / Orange County Fencing Center | 224 | 639 | 196.9 | 72% | ||
Pool | D | 2:5 | SASOMSUP Kaison | 2 | U | 6 | United Fencing Academy | 602 | 442 | 91.5 | 41% | ||
Pool | D | 1:5 | WU William | 11 | U | 9 | SoCAL Fencing Center | -132 | 350 | 170.5 | 76% | ||
Pool | D | 3:5 | PARK Ethan | 12 | U | 11 | Precision Athletics Fencing Club | 645 | 180 | 44.1 | 28% | ||
Pool | V | 5:3 | CHEN Andrew | 1 | U | 14 | SoCAL Fencing Center | -153 | 136 | 54.9 | 66% | ||
Pool | D | 4:5 | NACU Andre | 15 | U | 12 | -46 | 191 | 98.5 | 64% |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | D | 0:5 | LI Mason | 6 | U | 8 | Silicon Valley Fencing Center | 935 | 2500 | 1330.8 | 94% | ||
Pool | D | 1:5 | YU Ethan | 20 | U | 2 | 949 | 1169 | 365.1 | 61% | |||
Pool | V | 5:4 | CHANG Hayden | 36 | U | 35 | LA International Fencing | 300 | 804 | 115.2 | 74% | ||
Pool | D | 1:5 | LIU Charles | 7 | U | 23 | Redstar Fencing Club Chicago | 903 | 919 | 193.2 | 51% | ||
Pool | D | 0:5 | HUANG Owen | 18 | U | 1 | Socal Fencing Center | 1165 | 726 | 87.5 | 27% | ||
T64 | D | 6:10 | GAO Ethan | 15 | U | 32 | Socal Fencing Center | 982 | 2500 | 1217.1 | 92% |