Rank | Name | Strength |
Conservative Estimate* Cons. Est.* |
180-day Trend |
Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Qian, Crystal | 3823 | 3561 | - | A22 |
2 | He, Elizabeth | 3779 | 3507 | 10 | A22 |
3 | Apelian, Katherine | 3653 | 3378 | - | A22 |
4 | Jing, Alexandra | 3638 | 3373 | - | A21 |
5 | Conway, Josephina | 3625 | 3363 | 63 | A23 |
6 | Koo, Rachel | 3586 | 3318 | 17 | A21 |
7 | Hung, Juliana | 3544 | 3258 | 1 | A22 |
8 | Talavera, Daena | 3498 | 3210 | 21 | A22 |
9 | Knight, Skylar | 3464 | 3208 | 52 | A21 |
10 | Gaydos, Sofia | 3456 | 3144 | - | B23 |
11 | Jo, Mia | 3318 | 3049 | 4 | B22 |
12 | Serban, Samantha | 3297 | 3031 | 36 | B23 |
13 | Davia, Daniella | 3230 | 2972 | 21 | A21 |
14 | Hall, Velma | 3230 | 2968 | 24 | B22 |
15 | Massick, Laine | 3224 | 2955 | - | B23 |
16 | Kline, Melissa | 3181 | 2882 | 55 | B23 |
17 | Yu, Seneca | 3161 | 2872 | - | B21 |
18 | Miller, Naomi | 3090 | 2833 | 2 | B22 |
19 | Xue, Alanna | 3080 | 2824 | 14 | B22 |
20 | TORRES, JIMENA | 3287 | 2810 | 21 | A22 |
21 | Khoo, Lauren | 3072 | 2803 | - | B22 |
22 | DeBack, Greta | 3074 | 2789 | 31 | B22 |
23 | Heckmann, Emma | 3015 | 2707 | - | B21 |
24 | LUO, ZIWEN | 2955 | 2649 | - | C22 |
25 | Bradford, Meeah | 2884 | 2572 | - | C22 |
26 | Perlman, Talia | 2847 | 2546 | 1 | C21 |
27 | Vianna, Gabriella | 3038 | 2545 | 16 | A22 |
28 | Vasile, Karina | 3445 | 2493 | 2493 | A23 |
29 | Prieto, Sofia | 2776 | 2477 | - | C19 |
30 | Adams Kim, Natalie | 2725 | 2442 | 7 | B21 |
31 | Ertun, Lal | 3286 | 2357 | 2357 | A23 |
32 | Du, Hannah | 2618 | 2353 | 22 | B23 |
33 | Liu, Siyuan | 2706 | 2352 | - | D22 |
34 | Long, Madeline | 2546 | 2248 | - | C22 |
35 | Webb, Ella | 2506 | 2212 | 1 | C23 |
36 | Wang, Catherine | 2633 | 2194 | - | E22 |
37 | Tan, Clarisse | 2389 | 2091 | - | D22 |
38 | Yin, Helen | 2376 | 2086 | 13 | C21 |
39 | Converse, Madilynn | 2466 | 2060 | 21 | D20 |
40 | Weintraub, Io | 2514 | 2049 | - | C20 |
41 | Oliveira, Lavinia | 2324 | 2036 | 19 | C22 |
* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athetes with estimates over 2000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.