| Rank | Name | Strength |
Conservative Estimate* Cons. Est.* |
180-day Trend |
Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chen, Jia | 3573 | 3314 | 8 | A24 |
| 2 | Pevzner, Victoria | 3534 | 3276 | 67 | A24 |
| 3 | Takamizawa, Yukari | 3397 | 3070 | 72 | A23 |
| 4 | Sood, Ishani | 3244 | 2991 | 14 | A23 |
| 5 | Zhang, Alina | 3249 | 2990 | 23 | A24 |
| 6 | Jang, Kimberley | 3237 | 2977 | 59 | A24 |
| 7 | Ouyang, Bridgette | 3210 | 2951 | 5 | A24 |
| 8 | Guerra, Sofia | 3082 | 2819 | - | B21 |
| 9 | Randolph, Piper | 3013 | 2756 | 26 | A23 |
| 10 | Namgalauri, Mariam | 3009 | 2741 | - | B23 |
| 11 | Zhao, Sophie | 2996 | 2734 | 5 | A22 |
| 12 | Li, Rachel | 2986 | 2728 | - | A22 |
| 13 | Lee, Ji Ahn | 2937 | 2678 | 92 | B24 |
| 14 | Batra, Chaahat | 2942 | 2669 | - | B21 |
| 15 | Peng, Amber | 2893 | 2634 | - | B23 |
| 16 | Seigel, Norah | 2927 | 2577 | - | B24 |
| 17 | Yen, Natalie | 2910 | 2551 | - | D21 |
| 18 | Sun, Chien-Yu | 2803 | 2539 | - | C22 |
| 19 | Lambert, Mahala | 2824 | 2523 | - | D22 |
| 20 | Kostelny, Alexis | 2771 | 2507 | 29 | A24 |
| 21 | Pant, Anisha | 2780 | 2505 | 5 | B22 |
| 22 | Nikolic, Alexandra | 2766 | 2502 | - | C23 |
| 23 | Cannon, Lira | 2787 | 2486 | 18 | C23 |
| 24 | Zhao, Aileen | 2673 | 2414 | - | B22 |
| 25 | Liu, YiYang | 3124 | 2406 | 439 | B23 |
| 26 | Fu, Qihan | 2654 | 2391 | - | C22 |
| 27 | Wong, Sophia | 2635 | 2374 | - | C22 |
| 28 | Gu, Emily | 2576 | 2320 | - | B22 |
| 29 | Papp, Jazmin | 3331 | 2285 | 2285 | A23 |
| 30 | Su, Michelle | 2540 | 2272 | - | D22 |
| 31 | Hayes, Alyssa | 2524 | 2199 | - | B22 |
| 32 | Beaver, Hannah | 2443 | 2179 | 41 | D24 |
| 33 | Upton, Sydney | 2608 | 2175 | - | E24 |
| 34 | Guan, Sophie | 2498 | 2168 | - | C23 |
| 35 | Vaughan, Norah | 2394 | 2128 | 12 | C24 |
| 36 | Markovsky, Nina | 2379 | 2118 | 11 | C23 |
| 37 | Hwang, Alison | 2375 | 2098 | - | D21 |
| 38 | Tom, Caitlyn | 2441 | 2077 | - | U |
| 39 | Lee, Fiona | 2358 | 2053 | 45 | B24 |
| 40 | Welborn, Calissa | 2308 | 2024 | - | D23 |
* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 2000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.