| Rank | Name | Strength |
Conservative Estimate* Cons. Est.* |
180-day Trend |
Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chen, Jia | 3570 | 3313 | 11 | A24 |
| 2 | Pevzner, Victoria | 3499 | 3239 | 13 | A24 |
| 3 | Takamizawa, Yukari | 3343 | 3007 | 9 | A23 |
| 4 | Zhang, Alina | 3257 | 2998 | 33 | A24 |
| 5 | Sood, Ishani | 3244 | 2991 | 20 | A23 |
| 6 | Jang, Kimberley | 3251 | 2990 | 70 | A24 |
| 7 | Ouyang, Bridgette | 3211 | 2953 | 15 | A24 |
| 8 | Guerra, Sofia | 3082 | 2819 | - | B21 |
| 9 | Zhao, Sophie | 3010 | 2747 | 9 | A22 |
| 10 | Namgalauri, Mariam | 3009 | 2741 | - | B23 |
| 11 | Li, Rachel | 2986 | 2728 | - | A22 |
| 12 | Randolph, Piper | 2979 | 2722 | 14 | A23 |
| 13 | Batra, Chaahat | 2942 | 2669 | - | B21 |
| 14 | Lee, Ji Ahn | 2896 | 2636 | 65 | B24 |
| 15 | Peng, Amber | 2893 | 2634 | - | B23 |
| 16 | Seigel, Norah | 2927 | 2577 | - | B24 |
| 17 | Yen, Natalie | 2910 | 2551 | - | D21 |
| 18 | Sun, Chien-Yu | 2803 | 2539 | - | C22 |
| 19 | Lambert, Mahala | 2824 | 2523 | - | D22 |
| 20 | Pant, Anisha | 2780 | 2505 | 5 | B22 |
| 21 | Nikolic, Alexandra | 2766 | 2502 | - | C23 |
| 22 | Cannon, Lira | 2787 | 2486 | 38 | C23 |
| 23 | Kostelny, Alexis | 2739 | 2475 | 5 | C24 |
| 24 | Zhao, Aileen | 2673 | 2414 | 9 | B22 |
| 25 | Liu, YiYang | 3124 | 2406 | 439 | B23 |
| 26 | Fu, Qihan | 2654 | 2391 | - | C22 |
| 27 | Wong, Sophia | 2635 | 2374 | - | C22 |
| 28 | Gu, Emily | 2576 | 2320 | - | B22 |
| 29 | Papp, Jazmin | 3331 | 2285 | 2285 | A23 |
| 30 | Su, Michelle | 2540 | 2272 | - | D22 |
| 31 | Hayes, Alyssa | 2524 | 2199 | - | B22 |
| 32 | Beaver, Hannah | 2464 | 2199 | 25 | D24 |
| 33 | Upton, Sydney | 2608 | 2175 | - | E24 |
| 34 | Guan, Sophie | 2498 | 2168 | 31 | C23 |
| 35 | Vaughan, Norah | 2394 | 2128 | 29 | C24 |
| 36 | Markovsky, Nina | 2377 | 2115 | 9 | C23 |
| 37 | Hwang, Alison | 2375 | 2098 | 14 | D21 |
| 38 | Tom, Caitlyn | 2441 | 2077 | - | U |
| 39 | Welborn, Calissa | 2308 | 2024 | - | D23 |
| 40 | Lee, Fiona | 2335 | 2022 | 14 | B24 |
* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 2000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.