Brandeis University - Waltham, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHANG Daniel D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% | |
2 | LYU Victor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 27% | 3% |
3 | LIU Patrick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 77% | |
3 | WU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | |
5 | LI Brandon H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | |
6 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% | |
7 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 58% | |
8 | KLOSTERMANN Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 31% | |
9 | LIN Richard W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 46% |
10 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% | |
11 | WELCH Kyle J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% |
12 | WU Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% | 30% |
13 | LI Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 23% | |
14 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | 5% | |
15 | UM Ethan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 54% | |
16 | BING Charles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 60% | 16% | |
17 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 41% | |
18 | JIANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 5% | |
19 | DU Samuel R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 15% | |
20 | ZOBEL Eric H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 19% | |
21 | DAI Jonathan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 25% | |
22 | GONG Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 25% | 3% |
23 | DAUM Charlie | 100% | 99% | 88% | 37% | 5% | - | |
24 | ZHANG Andy W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 56% | |
24 | SCHENCK Koen M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 27% | |
26 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 10% | |
27 | HOWARD Michael | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | |
28 | ACHILOV Sayid | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 4% | |
29 | SACCOCCIO Nicholas P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 30% | |
30 | SHIN Joshua J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% | 4% | |
31 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 100% | 99% | 91% | 51% | 12% | 1% | |
32 | LI Eric | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 9% | |
33 | DOBBINS Evan W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 17% | |
34 | ADLER David R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% | 17% | |
35 | TSAI Max W. | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 6% | - | |
36 | MCLEAN Miles K. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 55% | 11% | 1% | |
37 | DESANDO Michael R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% | 8% | |
38 | LIU Jinning | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 24% | 3% | |
39 | DENG Kenny | 100% | 66% | 21% | 3% | < 1% | - | - |
40 | BREIER Matthew F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 13% | |
41 | MIALL Steven A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 22% | 1% | |
42 | DEGREMONT Henri S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | 26% | 3% | |
43 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 100% | 89% | 43% | 6% | - | |
44 | TEMPLE Jackson | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% | 6% | |
45 | BOLAÑOS CAMACHO Alejandro | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 19% | |
46 | XIAO Anthony | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 32% | 2% | |
46 | LIN Michael | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 33% | 2% | |
48 | WANG Mason | 100% | 99% | 86% | 43% | 9% | - | |
49 | BUCKLEY-JONES Henry C. | 100% | 93% | 61% | 19% | 2% | - | |
50 | MILLER Aidan A. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 24% | 3% | - | |
51 | POPESCU Tudor | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | |
52 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | 100% | 82% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | |
53 | BOUSSY Luciano | 100% | 96% | 74% | 30% | 4% | - | - |
54 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - |
55 | SIEGEL Elliot | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 11% | |
56 | CHAN Matthew | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
57 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% | 16% | |
58 | BOOTHMAN Colby | 100% | 77% | 34% | 7% | - | - | |
59 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 100% | 100% | 93% | 55% | 10% | - | |
60 | BOUTIN Nathaniel J. | 100% | 91% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | |
61 | LI Arvin | 100% | 99% | 83% | 35% | 4% | - | |
62 | LU Yikai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 25% | 3% |
63 | SHAO Eric | 100% | 96% | 65% | 19% | 2% | - | |
64 | ASCIONED'ELIA Adam I. | 100% | 98% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | |
65 | SANTULLI Tristan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | 19% | 2% | |
66 | AMRANI David | 100% | 91% | 38% | 6% | - | - | |
67 | LI Ayren | 100% | 76% | 24% | 2% | - | - | |
68 | WILBERT Matt | 100% | 96% | 73% | 32% | 5% | - | |
69 | XU Ethan | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 1% | - | |
70 | BORGAL Cameron | 100% | 95% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | |
71 | LIGH Thomas | 100% | 81% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
72 | DESOLA Aidan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 22% | 2% |
73 | VO Jonathan | 100% | 53% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
74 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | 100% | 97% | 66% | 17% | 2% | - | |
75 | ALIMI Yacine A. | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 6% | - | |
76 | BARTRAM Carter H. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
77 | CURTIS William K. | 100% | 94% | 67% | 26% | 4% | - | |
78 | ZHENG Harrison | 100% | 69% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
79 | CUTLER Andrew | 100% | 80% | 37% | 7% | 1% | - | |
80 | CARPENTER Liam | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | |
81 | GNEUHS Sam | 100% | 60% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
82 | WILSON Samuel S. | 100% | 60% | 10% | - | - | - | |
83 | BANSAL Rahul | 100% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | |
84 | GARDINER Luke J. | 100% | 79% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - |
85 | THADHANI Elio | 100% | 49% | 8% | - | - | - | |
86 | DREW Nicolas | 100% | 90% | 31% | 4% | - | - | |
86 | WU Michael | 100% | 72% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
88 | WOHLERS Casey | 100% | 72% | 24% | 3% | - | - | |
89 | MONTALBINE Aidan | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
89 | DOHONEY Tommy | 100% | 27% | 2% | - | - | - | |
89 | XIAO Bowen | 100% | 76% | 32% | 6% | - | - | |
92 | RIPA Joseph K. | 100% | 12% | - | - | - | - | |
93 | ABRUZZESE Owen | 100% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | |
93 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 57% | 8% | - | - | - | |
95 | BAO Chris W. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | 10% | 1% | - |
95 | EBERMAN Henry | 100% | 55% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
97 | WOHLERS Trevor | 100% | 53% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
97 | BISHOP Henry | 100% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.