Marin Fencing Academy - San Rafael, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LOWE-THORPE Tyler | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% |
| 2 | GARRETT Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% |
| 3 | ZHANG Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% |
| 3 | SARKAR Agniv | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 9% | |
| 5 | ZAYDMAN David M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 15% | |
| 6 | WONG Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 15% |
| 7 | SARKAR Anish | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 36% | 6% |
| 8 | YEE Johnathan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | |
| 9 | LOGUE Ethan D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 32% |
| 10 | GOLDBERG Artie M. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 11 | HANSEN Kira | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
| 12 | NICHOLSON Dimitri E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 19% |
| 13 | NICHOLSON Dominic A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | |
| 14 | NG Biwon | 100% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 15 | LUCERO-OLSON Aydin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
| 16 | PRAKASH Hari | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 17 | GUPTA Karan | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 14% | 2% | |
| 18 | KUO Elvin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 47% | 4% |
| 19 | RICHARD Silas | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 20 | LOUIE Sarah | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 21 | FERRER Alison | 100% | 74% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | SITTER Gregoire | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 23 | SRIVASTAVA Arya | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 24 | LUO Xiao Ran | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 25 | SCHOLL Zander | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 18% | 2% | |
| 26 | KUO Rylan | 100% | 97% | 77% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 26 | CHANG Celine A. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 28 | RAJ Shrey | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | DUONG Zoey | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 30 | GU Aidan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% | 1% |
| 31 | KUO Michael | 100% | 98% | 62% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | CONTI Braeden | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | AHMED Rania | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 35 | LIN Ashley | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
| 36 | MANSINGH Michael | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 37 | LAI Aaron | 100% | 81% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | ASTLE Stephen | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 39 | CHIEM Karen | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 40 | LOWELL Justin | 100% | 95% | 61% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | DUONG John | 100% | 91% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.