The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Silicon Valley RYC/RCC

Y-14 Men's Foil

Saturday, April 9, 2022 at 8:00 AM

City Beach Fremont - Fremont, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 SISINNI Riccardo - - - 2% 14% 41% 42%
2 SOTO-ULEV Aden A. - - - 5% 22% 43% 29%
3 WANG Ethan - - 4% 19% 37% 30% 8%
3 NICOLETTI Luca - - - 1% 12% 45% 41%
5 SIU Aiden - - - - 1% 18% 81%
6 NGUYEN Martin - - 1% 5% 22% 42% 30%
7 PARK Gabriel - - 2% 13% 34% 38% 13%
8 CO Dylan - - 2% 10% 31% 39% 18%
9 RASMUSSEN Sage - - 2% 12% 31% 38% 16%
10 OH Jaden - - 3% 19% 47% 31%
11 FUKUDA Diego - - - 4% 20% 43% 33%
12 DERRICK Blake - - 4% 19% 39% 31% 7%
13 LI Jett - - 3% 16% 35% 35% 11%
14 WU Lucas - - 1% 11% 37% 45% 6%
15 LAM Nicolas - 1% 11% 33% 39% 14% 1%
16 TSAY Jordan R. - 2% 12% 29% 35% 19% 3%
17 LO Preston - - 2% 13% 34% 37% 14%
18 KIM Aiden - - 1% 9% 28% 41% 21%
19 WU Alber Y. - - 2% 14% 35% 35% 13%
20 PARK Ryan - 5% 24% 38% 25% 7% 1%
21 LING Eddie - - - 3% 22% 49% 25%
22 LYNCH Owen C. - - 2% 14% 34% 36% 14%
23 LI Matthew - - 5% 24% 45% 25%
24 ZHANG Graham 1% 7% 27% 41% 21% 3% -
25 WONG Evan - 2% 14% 37% 36% 11% -
26 FANG Jaden - 4% 22% 38% 27% 8% 1%
27 RAUTUREAU Hugo - 3% 18% 36% 31% 11% 1%
28 CHOI Ethan 1% 7% 25% 37% 24% 7% 1%
29 SAH Steven - 8% 27% 36% 22% 6% 1%
29 RAUTUREAU Arthur 1% 13% 33% 34% 15% 3% -
31 PARK Steve (Sangmin) 1% 10% 29% 36% 19% 4% -
32 HIRAMOTO Satoshi 3% 20% 37% 28% 10% 2% -
33 PINCHENG Yao - - 2% 12% 33% 38% 15%
34 KIM Daniel Y. - 1% 7% 25% 39% 24% 5%
35 PARK Rion - 5% 25% 41% 24% 4% -
36 MAK Osman K. 1% 15% 41% 33% 9% 1%
37 YANG Charles - 3% 18% 37% 30% 10% 1%
38 ZHANG Aaron - - 1% 10% 31% 41% 16%
39 AGRAWAL Niki 1% 7% 25% 36% 24% 7% 1%
40 LIU William 2% 14% 32% 32% 16% 3% -
41 PETROV Mikhail 26% 42% 24% 7% 1% - -
42 ZHOU Ryan 5% 22% 36% 27% 9% 1% -
43 KROVIDI Arush 6% 29% 38% 21% 5% - -
44 UHLIG Cole - 6% 28% 43% 20% 3%
45 KETTELLE John - 3% 16% 34% 32% 13% 2%
46 LI Richard 2% 20% 37% 29% 10% 2% -
47 NGAI Julian - 2% 14% 32% 34% 15% 2%
48 DENG David 1% 13% 37% 35% 12% 1% -
49 HE Bourne 19% 44% 29% 7% 1% - -
50 MANIKTALA Suvir 7% 30% 38% 20% 5% 1% -
51 KAREHT Kai 27% 47% 22% 4% - -
52 COONAN Seamus 37% 48% 14% 2% - -
53 TULYAG Azim 1% 12% 39% 34% 12% 2% -
54 CHUN Dashel 12% 45% 33% 10% 1% - -
55 ZHANG Jayden 2% 13% 33% 34% 16% 3% -
56 PERKINS Jaray 41% 41% 15% 2% - - -
57 ZHANG Max 17% 47% 29% 7% 1% - -
58 TAN Youkai (Isaac) 46% 40% 12% 2% - - -
59 GORDON William L. 12% 39% 34% 13% 2% - -
60 SISINNI Leonardo 22% 40% 27% 9% 1% - -
61 CHAN Joseph 6% 25% 36% 24% 8% 1% -
62 ZHONG Maxwell 48% 41% 10% 1% - - -
62 GUPTA Tarush 2% 34% 48% 14% 1% - -
64 LIANG Ethan 69% 27% 4% - - - -
65 PEZESHKI Oliver 77% 21% 2% - - - -
66 WILLEY Emerson 5% 45% 37% 11% 2% - -
66 LEHTINEN Axel 17% 41% 31% 10% 2% - -
68 LUI Justin 5% 31% 41% 20% 4% - -
69 FU Bryan 60% 34% 6% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.