City Beach Fremont - Fremont, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SISINNI Riccardo | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% |
2 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% |
3 | WANG Ethan | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
3 | NICOLETTI Luca | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 45% | 41% |
5 | SIU Aiden | - | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 81% |
6 | NGUYEN Martin | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
7 | PARK Gabriel | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 13% |
8 | CO Dylan | - | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
9 | RASMUSSEN Sage | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 16% |
10 | OH Jaden | - | - | 3% | 19% | 47% | 31% | |
11 | FUKUDA Diego | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
12 | DERRICK Blake | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 7% |
13 | LI Jett | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 35% | 11% |
14 | WU Lucas | - | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 45% | 6% |
15 | LAM Nicolas | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 14% | 1% |
16 | TSAY Jordan R. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
17 | LO Preston | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% |
18 | KIM Aiden | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
19 | WU Alber Y. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 13% |
20 | PARK Ryan | - | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
21 | LING Eddie | - | - | - | 3% | 22% | 49% | 25% |
22 | LYNCH Owen C. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% |
23 | LI Matthew | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 25% | |
24 | ZHANG Graham | 1% | 7% | 27% | 41% | 21% | 3% | - |
25 | WONG Evan | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 11% | - |
26 | FANG Jaden | - | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
27 | RAUTUREAU Hugo | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
28 | CHOI Ethan | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
29 | SAH Steven | - | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
29 | RAUTUREAU Arthur | 1% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
31 | PARK Steve (Sangmin) | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
32 | HIRAMOTO Satoshi | 3% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
33 | PINCHENG Yao | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
34 | KIM Daniel Y. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
35 | PARK Rion | - | 5% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 4% | - |
36 | MAK Osman K. | 1% | 15% | 41% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
37 | YANG Charles | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
38 | ZHANG Aaron | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 16% |
39 | AGRAWAL Niki | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
40 | LIU William | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
41 | PETROV Mikhail | 26% | 42% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
42 | ZHOU Ryan | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
43 | KROVIDI Arush | 6% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
44 | UHLIG Cole | - | 6% | 28% | 43% | 20% | 3% | |
45 | KETTELLE John | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
46 | LI Richard | 2% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
47 | NGAI Julian | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
48 | DENG David | 1% | 13% | 37% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - |
49 | HE Bourne | 19% | 44% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
50 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 7% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
51 | KAREHT Kai | 27% | 47% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
52 | COONAN Seamus | 37% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
53 | TULYAG Azim | 1% | 12% | 39% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
54 | CHUN Dashel | 12% | 45% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
55 | ZHANG Jayden | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
56 | PERKINS Jaray | 41% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
57 | ZHANG Max | 17% | 47% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
58 | TAN Youkai (Isaac) | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
59 | GORDON William L. | 12% | 39% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
60 | SISINNI Leonardo | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
61 | CHAN Joseph | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
62 | ZHONG Maxwell | 48% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
62 | GUPTA Tarush | 2% | 34% | 48% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
64 | LIANG Ethan | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
65 | PEZESHKI Oliver | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
66 | WILLEY Emerson | 5% | 45% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
66 | LEHTINEN Axel | 17% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
68 | LUI Justin | 5% | 31% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
69 | FU Bryan | 60% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.