The Fencing Center of San Jose - San Jose, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | D V V V V | V V V V V | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 2 | LOGUE Ethan D. | V V D V V | V V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 3 | SARKAR Agniv | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 3 | MING Nathan | V D D V | V V V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 5 | WELDON Benjamin | V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 6 | SARKAR Anish | V V D V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 7 | KUO Elvin | V V V V D | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 8 | OLANDER Gabriel | D V D D V | V V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 9 | WATT Darren | V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 10 | RAJ Shrey | V D V V | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 11 | KELLEY Thomas (TJ) J. | V V V D D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 12 | YEE Johnathan | V D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 13 | ULINICH Alexander | D V V D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 14 | GOLDBERG Artie M. | D V D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 15 | TONG Samuel | V D D V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 16 | GU Aidan | D D D D V | V V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 17 | SIRBU Dan | V V V V V | D | 2.0 | 5 | +3.0 |
| 18 | ZAYDMAN David M. | V V V V D | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 19 | HOFMAN Haejung | V D D V V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 20 | LUONG Allen | V D D D V | D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 21 | KUO Rylan | V D V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 22 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | V D D V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 23 | ZHANG Nathan | D V D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 24 | MA Katelyn | D D V D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 25 | DUONG Zoey | V D D D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 26 | HAWKINS Laura A. | D V V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 27 | BECK Brian C. | D D V V D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 27 | BARNETT Devin | D D V V D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 29 | ANGADALA Leela Krishna | D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 29 | KUO Michael | D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 31 | AHMED Saheer | D V D D D | V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 32 | MADRID Maureen | D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 33 | CHA Eugenie | D D V D D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 | |
| 34 | SIMONI James | D D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 35 | MEWES Katie M. | D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.