The Fencing Center of San Jose - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 46% | 33% |
| 2 | LOGUE Ethan D. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 3 | SARKAR Agniv | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% |
| 3 | MING Nathan | 1% | 10% | 35% | 40% | 14% | |
| 5 | WELDON Benjamin | - | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 51% |
| 6 | SARKAR Anish | - | - | 2% | 25% | 48% | 25% |
| 7 | KUO Elvin | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
| 8 | OLANDER Gabriel | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% |
| 9 | WATT Darren | - | 6% | 28% | 43% | 22% | |
| 10 | RAJ Shrey | 13% | 42% | 34% | 10% | 1% | |
| 11 | KELLEY Thomas (TJ) J. | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 11% |
| 12 | YEE Johnathan | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 13 | ULINICH Alexander | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 14% | |
| 14 | GOLDBERG Artie M. | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 15 | TONG Samuel | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 16 | GU Aidan | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 2% |
| 17 | SIRBU Dan | 5% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 5% | < 1% |
| 18 | ZAYDMAN David M. | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
| 19 | HOFMAN Haejung | 17% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 20 | LUONG Allen | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 45% | 23% |
| 21 | KUO Rylan | 6% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 19% | 43% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 23 | ZHANG Nathan | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 24 | MA Katelyn | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 25 | DUONG Zoey | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 26 | HAWKINS Laura A. | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | BECK Brian C. | - | 2% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% |
| 27 | BARNETT Devin | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 29 | ANGADALA Leela Krishna | 10% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 29 | KUO Michael | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 31 | AHMED Saheer | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
| 32 | MADRID Maureen | 8% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 33 | CHA Eugenie | 7% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 34 | SIMONI James | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | MEWES Katie M. | 49% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.