Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TAFOYA Devin D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% | |
| 2 | BLYTH Jourdain L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% |
| 3 | LI Patrick | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 9% | |
| 3 | WALSH Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
| 5 | CLAYMAN John A. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 6 | SMITH Jackson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 37% | |
| 7 | TIBERI Joseph (Joe) H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
| 8 | STRAUSS Luke | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 27% | 4% | |
| 9 | SHUGART Henry R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% |
| 10 | SATTERFIELD Donald | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 8% | - | |
| 11 | CRANFORD Cory A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 31% | 4% |
| 12 | DANIS Blake M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 13 | LUTTON Thomas (Tom) W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 9% |
| 14 | RASMUSSEN Nathan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% | |
| 15 | LEE Seungwon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 15% | |
| 16 | CHOI Kaiden I. | 100% | 97% | 39% | 6% | - | - | |
| 17 | NIEBERGALL Colin G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 9% |
| 18 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 13% |
| 19 | GAO Zachary | 100% | 99% | 82% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 20 | PEARSON Heila | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 21 | HARR Carver | 100% | 99% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 1% | |
| 22 | COLE Matthew | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 23 | TORRES Nicolas | 100% | 99% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 24 | MCADOO Declan | 100% | 97% | 68% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 25 | SCHULZ Annie | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 22% | 2% | |
| 26 | WEBER Nora | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 27 | LANDWEHR Helen B. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 28 | YODER Bridget H. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 29 | TRIFILETTI Lawrence T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
| 30 | HUTCHINSON Valerie A. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% | 15% | 1% | - |
| 31 | FRENCH Phaelen | 100% | 90% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 32 | ALPERSTEIN Donald W. | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 33 | CHAN Andrew M. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 34 | FREEMAN Kate | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 35 | TOLLEFSEN Zachary | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 36 | BLANCHARD Timothy | 100% | 39% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | MESCHIA Maggie | 100% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 38 | LEWIS Cole | 100% | 30% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 39 | ANDERSON Donald | 100% | 74% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.