Remenyik ROC and RJCC

Division IA Women’s Saber (D1AWS)

Sunday, October 13, 2024 at 1:30 PM

Register

Ryan Fieldhouse - Evanston, IL

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3302 3441 - 3200
5 - 8 3163 3220 - 3064
9 - 16 2414 2830 - 1975
17 - 26 1833 2890 - 669

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Oishi, Megumi Northwestern University NCAA A24 3441 3175.37
2 Sathyanath, Kailing Northwestern University NCAA A21 3228 2969.91
3 Dungey, Amelia Texas Sabre Academy B23 3340 2953.10
4 Shearer, Natalie Northwestern University NCAA A24 3200 2935.01
5 Hild, Nisha Northwestern University NCAA A23 3187 2929.76
6 Chen, Xiaohan Northwestern University NCAA A23 3220 2926.65
7 Bois, Adele Northwestern University NCAA A23 3181 2924.05
8 Erikson, Kira Northwestern University NCAA A23 3064 2810.45
9 Lu, Amy Northwestern University NCAA B23 2830 2555.23
10 Wang, Gloria Ruoyan Culver Military Academy A24 2742 2423.98
11 Pabian, Emilia Midwest Fencing Club B23 2466 2196.49
12 Wu, Yuwei Bergen Fencing Club B24 2466 2157.96
13 Sayson, Andrea Culver Military Academy B24 2445 1990.09
14 Pettit, Sara Iowa City Fencing Center D22 2396 1868.54
15 Chami, Lana Renaissance Fencing Club E24 1975 1598.64
16 Sobery, Lillian Fence St. Louis E24 1995 1452.98
17 Zawada, Milena Midwest Fencing Club E24 1782 1442.90
18 Grody, Emmie RedStar Fencing Club Chicago E22 2890 1299.10
19 Aldort, Amanda Midwest Fencing Club E24 1720 1248.85
20 Jachymiak, Emilia Midwest Fencing Club U 1618 1228.62
21 SCHOON, REBECCA Globus Fencing Academy U 1854 1226.18
22 Finn, Lucy Fence St. Louis U 1950 991.33
23 Xiao, Sophia Madison Fencing Academy U 1568 491.99
24 Tang, Camilla D24 2500 < 0
25 Baazim, Hadeel RedStar Fencing Club Chicago U 1782 < 0
26 McCawley, Madeleine Lincoln Square Fencing U 669 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!