Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LI Eric | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 2 | HOWARD Michael | D V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 3 | MILLER Aidan A. | V V V D V | V V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 3 | LIN James G. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 5 | LI Matthew | V V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 6 | ZHAO Jesse | V V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 7 | PITERBARG Maxim | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 8 | LANG Dong Lin | V V V V D | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 9 | HODESS Ethan | V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 10 | WANG Mason | V V V V D V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 11 | CHENG Nathan | V V V D V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 12 | TSAI Max W. | V V V D V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 13 | MENG Zhaoyi | D V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 14 | RNO Kyler | V V V V D | V V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 15 | LI Arvin | V V D V V D | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 16 | WU Michael | V D V V D | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 17 | VALENTON Timothy | D V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 18 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | V V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 19 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | V V D D V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 20 | HUANG Jonathan | D D V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 21 | TALLARICO Matthew | D D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 22 | MCLEAN Miles K. | V V D D V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 23 | LI Ayren | D V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 24 | ZHEN Ethan | D V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 25 | ALIMI Yacine A. | V D V V D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 26 | DAVIDSON Elliot | V V D V D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 27 | SONG Noel | V D V V D D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 28 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | D V D V D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 29 | SHAO Eric | V V D D D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 30 | AMRANI David | V D V D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 31 | ZHENG Harrison | D V D D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 32 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | D D D D V | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 33 | SULLIVAN Matthew | V D V V D | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 34 | XU Ethan | D V D V D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 35 | WOHLERS Trevor | D D V D V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 36 | JIN Dennis H. | V D D D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 37 | QI Steve | V D D V D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 38 | MURDOCH Walter | D D V V D | D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
| 39 | GARDINER Luke J. | V D V D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 40 | DJONOUMA Toyohm | D D V D V | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 41 | KONG Luculentus X. | D D V V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 42 | GUO Hairuo | V D D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 43 | WUJASTYK Leon | V D V D D D | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 44 | EXNICIOS Richard M. | D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 45 | SATTAR Dylan | D V D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 46 | ABANILLA Luke | D D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 47 | BISHOP Henry | D D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 48 | FENG Michael | D V D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 49 | VO Jonathan | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 50 | HOLCOMB Cedric | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 51 | BROGAN Kevin | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 52 | RIPA Joseph K. | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 53 | EXNICIOS Rex | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 54 | HO Jor Sam | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 55 | SIANO Devon M. | D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 56 | TIBBETTS Justin | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.