Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LI Eric | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 41% | 50% |
| 2 | HOWARD Michael | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 43% | |
| 3 | MILLER Aidan A. | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 14% | |
| 3 | LIN James G. | - | - | - | 5% | 32% | 63% | |
| 5 | LI Matthew | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
| 6 | ZHAO Jesse | - | 1% | 13% | 37% | 38% | 10% | |
| 7 | PITERBARG Maxim | - | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 11% |
| 8 | LANG Dong Lin | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 45% | 17% | |
| 9 | HODESS Ethan | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% | |
| 10 | WANG Mason | - | - | 1% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 15% |
| 11 | CHENG Nathan | - | - | 2% | 17% | 45% | 36% | |
| 12 | TSAI Max W. | - | - | 5% | 25% | 43% | 26% | |
| 13 | MENG Zhaoyi | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 43% | 17% | |
| 14 | RNO Kyler | 3% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 15 | LI Arvin | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 12% |
| 16 | WU Michael | 1% | 8% | 30% | 41% | 19% | 3% | |
| 17 | VALENTON Timothy | - | 3% | 21% | 44% | 27% | 5% | |
| 18 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 11% | |
| 19 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 20 | HUANG Jonathan | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 21 | TALLARICO Matthew | 1% | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | |
| 22 | MCLEAN Miles K. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% | |
| 23 | LI Ayren | - | 4% | 23% | 47% | 23% | 3% | |
| 24 | ZHEN Ethan | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 33% | 8% | |
| 25 | ALIMI Yacine A. | - | - | 7% | 32% | 44% | 16% | |
| 26 | DAVIDSON Elliot | - | - | 5% | 30% | 51% | 13% | |
| 27 | SONG Noel | - | 9% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 28 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 29 | SHAO Eric | - | 3% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 7% | |
| 30 | AMRANI David | 1% | 17% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
| 31 | ZHENG Harrison | 7% | 42% | 38% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 6% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 33 | SULLIVAN Matthew | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 34 | XU Ethan | - | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 35 | WOHLERS Trevor | 1% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 36 | JIN Dennis H. | 1% | 12% | 42% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
| 37 | QI Steve | - | 4% | 22% | 42% | 28% | 5% | |
| 38 | MURDOCH Walter | 50% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 39 | GARDINER Luke J. | 6% | 30% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 40 | DJONOUMA Toyohm | 26% | 49% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 41 | KONG Luculentus X. | 16% | 43% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | GUO Hairuo | 10% | 36% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 43 | WUJASTYK Leon | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 44 | EXNICIOS Richard M. | 8% | 34% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 45 | SATTAR Dylan | 26% | 53% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 46 | ABANILLA Luke | 5% | 27% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 47 | BISHOP Henry | 22% | 44% | 27% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 48 | FENG Michael | 29% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 49 | VO Jonathan | 33% | 46% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 50 | HOLCOMB Cedric | 34% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 51 | BROGAN Kevin | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 52 | RIPA Joseph K. | 21% | 55% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 53 | EXNICIOS Rex | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 54 | HO Jor Sam | 50% | 42% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 55 | SIANO Devon M. | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 56 | TIBBETTS Justin | 75% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.