Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ONIK Elijah T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
| 2 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
| 3 | TRAUGOT Braden (Brady) C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 10% | |
| 3 | MARSHALL Ian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | |
| 5 | ASCIONED'ELIA Adam I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
| 6 | WEI William | 100% | 100% | 89% | 51% | 13% | 1% | |
| 7 | AHN Jun | 100% | 99% | 73% | 22% | |||
| 8 | SHA Yi Peng | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 9 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 10 | SEAH Chad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 35% |
| 11 | TIAN Aaron C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 19% | |
| 12 | FRITZ Ayden R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 7% |
| 13 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% |
| 14 | KULKARNI Ansh A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 19% |
| 15 | STRAYER Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 12% |
| 16 | BAE Kevin | 100% | 100% | 90% | 46% | |||
| 17 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% |
| 18 | FEDONCHIK Henry J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 5% |
| 19 | MAGIDSON Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | |
| 20 | GALLUCCI Charles John | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% | |
| 21 | BUERGIN Aidan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
| 22 | KIZHNER Fillip | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 23 | YULDASHEV Timur | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 24 | AMRANI David | 100% | 88% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 25 | REZNICK Nicholas J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 32% | |
| 26 | TIAN Yuzhe (Charlie) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% | |
| 27 | DU Samuel R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% | |
| 28 | MAHON Jacob | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 29 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 100% | 99% | 89% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 30 | ENGEL Henry R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 31 | HONG Issac | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 32 | DESOLA Aidan J. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
| 33 | SHIKHMAN Robert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 27% | |
| 34 | GRAHAM Aleko | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% |
| 34 | BOISLARD Adam J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 36 | YEE Charles E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 38% | 7% |
| 37 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 38 | ORR Aidan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | |
| 39 | SANTULLI Tristan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 39 | BROWN Alexander R. | 100% | 95% | 69% | 27% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 41 | VERSTEELE Sander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% |
| 42 | WERWA Griffith | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 43 | ZHAO Jesse | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 44 | WANG JONATHAN | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 45 | ANCONA Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 9% |
| 46 | BAO Wenyuan | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 47 | ABDELGAWAD Abdelrahman | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 48 | MACRAE Harrison A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 10% |
| 49 | MONTALVO-ZOTTER Gabriel M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% | |
| 50 | MAYER Richard | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 51 | BELLUOMO David C. | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 52 | BOUTIN Nathaniel J. | 100% | 99% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 53 | ADVINCULA Dash | 100% | 96% | 52% | 10% | |||
| 54 | MONTALBINE Aidan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 55 | EIG Ethan A. | 100% | 94% | 64% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 56 | HENSLEY Todd | 100% | 93% | 69% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 57 | SUN Matthew | 100% | 94% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 58 | SPOSATO Luke B. | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 59 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 60 | GALBAN Matthias L. | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 61 | WANG Gerald Y. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 62 | ARANA Massimo | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | HILMER Michael | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 64 | VAZQUEZ Sebastian A. | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 65 | YU Dale | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 66 | NITTEL Jake | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 67 | MUNDAHL Brandon D. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 67 | JUSTUS Benjamin | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 69 | GALLER Dave | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 69 | DEMARCO Matthew | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 71 | SONG Bryan | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 72 | BOUSSY Luciano | 100% | 89% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 73 | KLYCZEK Andrew | 100% | 100% | 88% | 48% | 12% | 1% | |
| 74 | MUNDAHL Morgan K. | 100% | 79% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 75 | CHOI-SLATTERY Kieran M. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 76 | ZHANG Zixuan "Mark" | 100% | 68% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 77 | CRANS Benjamin | 100% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 78 | GOLISANO Tyler A. | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 79 | ZHANG HANMO | 100% | 13% | - | - | |||
| 80 | ROTHCHILD Matthew | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 81 | VISHNEVSKY Aden | 100% | 7% | - | - | - | - | |
| 82 | KEANNA Peter | 100% | 99% | 83% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 83 | XU Mathu Yang | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 84 | MAGIDSON Josh | 100% | 86% | 46% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.