Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | SHAW Kayla M. | - | - | 1% | 14% | 46% | 39% |
2 | XU Madison | - | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 36% |
3 | BOODELL Ella | - | - | - | 8% | 48% | 44% |
3 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | - | 5% | 32% | 44% | 17% | 2% |
5 | BAKER-ROSENBERG Raynor S. | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% |
6 | SEGAL Lydia G. | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 12% |
7 | DRANOVSKY Dasha | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 13% |
8 | VEERKAMP Molly | - | - | 1% | 8% | 51% | 40% |
9 | HOLLE Aviella S. | - | - | 1% | 14% | 45% | 40% |
10 | MCSHINE Katelyn H. | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 68% |
11 | BHAN Zala | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
12 | BECCHINA Claire E. | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% |
13 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | - | 3% | 22% | 48% | 26% |
14 | SU Michelle | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 35% | 11% |
15 | SLASKI Caroline O. | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
16 | WERBACH Esther | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% |
17 | WEINTRAUB Io H. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 25% |
18 | JULIUS Sonia | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 4% |
19 | LOGAN Jade | - | 4% | 22% | 46% | 24% | 4% |
20 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 2% | 18% | 42% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
21 | OETZEL Taylor | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
22 | MCPHERSON Hannah C. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
23 | PAVE Claire | - | 7% | 39% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
24 | BHOGAL Sukhneet | 8% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 4% | - |
25 | BECKLEY Claire | 12% | 40% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - |
26 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | - | 7% | 31% | 43% | 17% | 2% |
27 | TAI Serena | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
28 | ZGOMBIC Emily | 10% | 37% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
29 | LEE Kaylin | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
30 | MUSTO Isabella | 4% | 25% | 43% | 25% | 2% | - |
31 | TAI Valerie | 39% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
32 | PARK Caitlyn | 5% | 26% | 44% | 24% | 2% | - |
33 | PARK Jacqueline | 46% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
34 | SCARLETT Skye | 41% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
35 | YANG Megan | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - |
35 | LEE Madison | 34% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
37 | PAN Anna | 3% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 7% | - |
38 | RICHARDS Ella | 10% | 53% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
39 | WOOLF Claudia Grace | 7% | 31% | 41% | 19% | 2% | - |
39 | PEIRCE Taylor | 11% | 41% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
41 | CAREY Aislynn | 9% | 37% | 40% | 13% | 1% | - |
42 | BAGASRA Sarah | 8% | 71% | 20% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.