Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 39% |
| 2 | XU Madison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 36% |
| 3 | BOODELL Ella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 44% |
| 3 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% | 19% | 2% |
| 5 | BAKER-ROSENBERG Raynor S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 16% |
| 6 | SEGAL Lydia G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 12% |
| 7 | DRANOVSKY Dasha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 13% |
| 8 | VEERKAMP Molly | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 40% |
| 9 | HOLLE Aviella S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 40% |
| 10 | MCSHINE Katelyn H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
| 11 | BHAN Zala | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
| 12 | BECCHINA Claire E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% |
| 13 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 26% |
| 14 | SU Michelle | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% |
| 15 | SLASKI Caroline O. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
| 16 | WERBACH Esther | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 7% |
| 17 | WEINTRAUB Io H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% |
| 18 | JULIUS Sonia | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 4% |
| 19 | LOGAN Jade | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 28% | 4% |
| 20 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 38% | 8% | 1% |
| 21 | OETZEL Taylor | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 22 | MCPHERSON Hannah C. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
| 23 | PAVE Claire | 100% | 100% | 93% | 53% | 13% | 1% |
| 24 | BHOGAL Sukhneet | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 25 | BECKLEY Claire | 100% | 88% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 26 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 19% | 2% |
| 27 | TAI Serena | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
| 28 | ZGOMBIC Emily | 100% | 90% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 29 | LEE Kaylin | 100% | 69% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 30 | MUSTO Isabella | 100% | 96% | 71% | 27% | 2% | - |
| 31 | TAI Valerie | 100% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | PARK Caitlyn | 100% | 95% | 69% | 26% | 2% | - |
| 33 | PARK Jacqueline | 100% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | SCARLETT Skye | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 35 | YANG Megan | 100% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 35 | LEE Madison | 100% | 66% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | PAN Anna | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 7% | - |
| 38 | RICHARDS Ella | 100% | 90% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 39 | WOOLF Claudia Grace | 100% | 93% | 62% | 21% | 2% | - |
| 39 | PEIRCE Taylor | 100% | 89% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 41 | CAREY Aislynn | 100% | 91% | 54% | 15% | 1% | - |
| 42 | BAGASRA Sarah | 100% | 92% | 22% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.