Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GINIS Nathan | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% | |
2 | ARIAS Cesar A | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% | |
3 | PARKHURST Jr Michael | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 42% | 17% | |
3 | CZAHA Balint | - | - | 2% | 17% | 46% | 35% | |
5 | HO Kaden M. | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 11% | |
6 | LASORSA Matthew | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 25% |
7 | LEVIN Mark A. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 34% | |
8 | STEINMETZ John | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
9 | HONG Vincent Q. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
9 | YUAN Kevin | - | - | 4% | 21% | 46% | 29% | |
11 | WU MENGKE | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% | |
12 | ALKEMPER Tristan H. | - | - | 6% | 28% | 44% | 22% | |
13 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
14 | BOURGHOL Matthew | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 3% | |
15 | WU Wilmund | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
16 | OVERDECK Andrew | 8% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | |
17 | GILLIGAN Wolff | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 29% | |
18 | NEVILLE James | 2% | 18% | 45% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
19 | PANDEY Neil | 2% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
20 | HUANG Tyler T. | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 31% | 4% | |
21 | HUANG Ethan F. | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 35% | 8% | |
22 | DEWEY Charles J. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
23 | SHTEYN Mark | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 13% | |
24 | DENG Andrew | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 9% | |
25 | CLYMER Lucas Y. | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 44% | 21% | |
26 | SPRANG Nicholas D. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
27 | BUCCINO George | 16% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
28 | MARGULIES William | 2% | 14% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
29 | WONG Ryan | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
30 | FISK Ethan | 2% | 16% | 43% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
31 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | |
32 | SPOSATO Andrew P. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
33 | GRYCIUK Koby | 37% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
34 | DEFORD Kevin W. | 33% | 48% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
35 | LEDERER Justin W. | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
36 | MYLEK Peter | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
37 | CHENG Kyle | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 31% | 7% | |
38 | MOULTON Ian | 33% | 46% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
39 | LEUNG Andrew K. | 23% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
40 | GONG Nanbo | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
41 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 31% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | |
42 | CHOU William | 29% | 49% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
43 | ZHENG Joshua | 40% | 46% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
44 | SANDERS Samuel B. | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
45 | MASSO Anthony | 33% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
46 | ZATZ Ben Z. | 33% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
47 | CHANG Yufeng | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
48 | SUSSMAN Jamie | 8% | 34% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | |
49 | BLACKBURN Henry | 29% | 48% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.