Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GINIS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% | |
| 2 | ARIAS Cesar A | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% | |
| 3 | PARKHURST Jr Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 17% | |
| 3 | CZAHA Balint | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 35% | |
| 5 | HO Kaden M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 11% | |
| 6 | LASORSA Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 25% |
| 7 | LEVIN Mark A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 34% | |
| 8 | STEINMETZ John | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 2% | |
| 9 | HONG Vincent Q. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% | |
| 9 | YUAN Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 29% | |
| 11 | WU MENGKE | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | |
| 12 | ALKEMPER Tristan H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 22% | |
| 13 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 14 | BOURGHOL Matthew | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% | 3% | |
| 15 | WU Wilmund | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 16 | OVERDECK Andrew | 100% | 92% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 17 | GILLIGAN Wolff | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% | |
| 18 | NEVILLE James | 100% | 98% | 81% | 36% | 7% | 1% | |
| 19 | PANDEY Neil | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 10% | 1% | |
| 20 | HUANG Tyler T. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 36% | 4% | |
| 21 | HUANG Ethan F. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% | 8% | |
| 22 | DEWEY Charles J. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 23 | SHTEYN Mark | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 13% | |
| 24 | DENG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 9% | |
| 25 | CLYMER Lucas Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 21% | |
| 26 | SPRANG Nicholas D. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 27 | BUCCINO George | 100% | 84% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | MARGULIES William | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
| 29 | WONG Ryan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
| 30 | FISK Ethan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% | 9% | 1% | |
| 31 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 32 | SPOSATO Andrew P. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 33 | GRYCIUK Koby | 100% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 34 | DEFORD Kevin W. | 100% | 67% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 35 | LEDERER Justin W. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 36 | MYLEK Peter | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 6% | |
| 37 | CHENG Kyle | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 38% | 7% | |
| 38 | MOULTON Ian | 100% | 67% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 39 | LEUNG Andrew K. | 100% | 77% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | GONG Nanbo | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
| 41 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 100% | 69% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | CHOU William | 100% | 71% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 43 | ZHENG Joshua | 100% | 60% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 44 | SANDERS Samuel B. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 45 | MASSO Anthony | 100% | 67% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 46 | ZATZ Ben Z. | 100% | 67% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | CHANG Yufeng | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | SUSSMAN Jamie | 100% | 92% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 49 | BLACKBURN Henry | 100% | 71% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.