Treasure Island YMCA - San Francisco, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NICOLETTI Luca | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 41% |
| 2 | LING Eddie | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
| 3 | TSAY Jordan R. | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 42% | 14% | |
| 3 | MORROW Brenden | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 40% |
| 5 | WONG Evan | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 13% |
| 6 | FUKUDA Diego | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% |
| 7 | KIM Daniel Y. | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 45% | 14% | |
| 8 | UHLIG Cole | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 5% |
| 9 | LO Preston | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
| 10 | WU Alber Y. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 51% | |
| 11 | DERRICK Blake | - | - | 2% | 18% | 49% | 31% | |
| 12 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | - | - | 1% | 13% | 45% | 40% | |
| 13 | SHEN Oliver | - | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 38% | 7% |
| 14 | NGUYEN Martin | - | - | 3% | 21% | 49% | 27% | |
| 15 | HIRAMOTO Satoshi | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 16 | DANIEL Nikith | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 17 | GORDON William L. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 18 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 19 | RASMUSSEN Sage | - | - | 2% | 15% | 47% | 36% | |
| 20 | RAUTUREAU Hugo | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 38% | |
| 21 | NGAI Julian | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 22 | TULYAG Azim | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 4% |
| 23 | ZHOU Ryan | 1% | 10% | 37% | 37% | 13% | 2% | |
| 24 | RAUTUREAU Arthur | 2% | 17% | 43% | 31% | 7% | - | |
| 25 | MANIKTALA Suvir | - | 5% | 27% | 46% | 19% | 2% | |
| 26 | CHAN Joseph | 10% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | WANG rainier | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 28 | LI Richard | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 29 | DULAI Angad | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 30 | PARK Rion | - | 4% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 4% | |
| 31 | CHUN Dashel | 3% | 23% | 46% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | HE Ian | 20% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | YUE Jackson | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 2% |
| 34 | SISINNI Leonardo | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 35 | PARK William | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 36 | CHANG Jonathan | 1% | 8% | 33% | 42% | 15% | 2% | |
| 37 | UPENDER West | 20% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | PETROV Mikhail | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 39 | HE Bourne | 12% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | TOYOFUKU Ethan | 5% | 20% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 41 | WU Thomas | 1% | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 42 | DULAI Agam | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 43 | FU Bryan | 36% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 44 | KIM Andrew | 37% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 45 | MORROW Sean | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 20% | 3% | |
| 46 | CHEN David | 36% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 47 | FUKUDA Brando | 5% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 48 | ZHANG Graham | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 49 | LIANG Ethan | 28% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 50 | WANG Brian Z. | 7% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 51 | SCHILLER Finnegan | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 52 | ANDRADE Cedric | 31% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | PORPORA Oliver | < 1% | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 54 | BANUELOS Dario | 30% | 46% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 55 | ARCARA Evan | 26% | 48% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 56 | HOM Logan | 28% | 49% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 57 | VAQUILAR Felix L. | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 58 | ZHONG Maxwell | 33% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 59 | KREISHER Ilan | 3% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.