The Fencing Center of San Jose - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BERMENDER Cameron | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% |
| 2 | OTAKE Jared K. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 29% |
| 3 | OH Samuel H. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 46% | 38% | |
| 3 | VAZQUEZ Zander | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
| 5 | WOO Christian | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 43% | 20% | |
| 6 | ZENG Lucas H. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 47% |
| 7 | VALOUEV Aleksey | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 27% | 7% | - |
| 8 | DARIANO Noah G. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
| 9 | DESAI Nalin H. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% | |
| 10 | XIAO EDWARD | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 28% |
| 11 | WYMAN Julian | - | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 28% | 5% |
| 12 | SISINNI Riccardo | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 9% | - |
| 13 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
| 14 | ZHANG Luke T. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 48% | 27% | |
| 15 | KIM Ryan Y. | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 16 | HSIUNG Richie | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 8% |
| 17 | CANLAS Nathan | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 31% | 10% |
| 18 | KHER Roan | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 19 | MA Bryant | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 20 | MCCOSH Evin M. | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% | |
| 21 | TSAY Jeremy M. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 14% |
| 22 | DETERING Julian | - | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 40% | 7% |
| 23 | JAUME Andrei | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
| 24 | MYERS Dean | 2% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 25 | HOSKERI Anik S. | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 6% | |
| 26 | FULTON Richard A. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 37% | 9% |
| 27 | ZHENG zhe | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 28 | DINSAY Kristjan | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 8% | - |
| 29 | WANG Ethan | 2% | 20% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 30 | GONZALEZ Matthew | - | 22% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 31 | ZHANG Jiening (Jason) | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | SEEDS Edward T. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 33 | NG Kenneth | 6% | 32% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 34 | CHEN Justin K. | 5% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 35 | SETLUR Bhrugu | 27% | 45% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | CHENG Jonathan | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | BAEK David | 5% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 38 | FINNEY Lorenz | 1% | 9% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
| 39 | WU Lucas | 8% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 40 | LI Matthew | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
| 41 | MA Andrew | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 42 | BALDWIN Timothy M. | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 43 | AIKEN Nicholas A. | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 44 | BOUCHARD Kai | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 45 | REICHEL Ezra | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 46 | SHEN Owen | 4% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 47 | SMITH Grant D. | 15% | 43% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
| 49 | TEH Ryan | 5% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 50 | ZHU Rui | 3% | 24% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 51 | EDISON Ansel | 24% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | FANG Jaden | 11% | 37% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | PIERCE Aaron | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 54 | LIM Charles Q. | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 55 | MAK Osman K. | 45% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 55 | AGRAWAL Niki | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 57 | LI Jett | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 58 | RUBIN Max | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 59 | BECKER Ethan | 79% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 60 | GUO Hairuo | 14% | 39% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.