ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LI Aaron | D V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 2 | NICOLL William | V V D D V V | V V V V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 3 | XU Andy P. | V D V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 3 | WONG Jackson | V D D V V V | V V V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 5 | LIU Derek | V D V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 6 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 7 | TANG Terry | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 8 | UNGERER Roger M. | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 9 | MATSAKH Philip | V V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 10 | LI Ayren | V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 11 | CULHANE Dechen | V V V V V D | V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 12 | GHEDINI Luca | V V D V V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 13 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | V V V D V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 14 | SHAPIRO Leon | V V V D V | V V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 15 | LIU Ryan | V V D D V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 16 | GUTH Joseph | D V V V D V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 17 | CHENG Ethan | D V V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 18 | TAN Aidan | V V V V D D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 19 | MILLER Jordan | V D V D V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 20 | SONG Noel | D V V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 21 | GERRISH William | V D V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 21 | WANG Brian | V D V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 23 | AKYAMAC Bora | V D D V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 24 | HIGGASON Hugh | D D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 25 | BRENNEMAN Titus | V D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 26 | KAPOOR Aayan | V V D D D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 27 | DALBERG Anders | V D D V V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 28 | ZHAO Adam | V V V D D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 29 | LEE Eugene | D V V D V D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 30 | CHEN Ethan | D V D V V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 31 | MUNDY Ezra | D V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 32 | LIU Eric | V V D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 33 | WANG Auther | D V V D V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 34 | SCHLACK Jake | V D V V D D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 35 | ZHANG Lucas | D D D V V V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 36 | SION Andrew | D V D V V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 37 | BOBROW Silas | V V D V D D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 38 | CHUNG Ian | D V D V D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 39 | SIMON Luke | D D D V D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 40 | LAO Kevin | D V D D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 41 | WONG Jacob W. | D D V V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 42 | ARUL Girish | V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 43 | BLEIL Tyler | D D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 44 | XIE Jicheng | D V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 45 | BROOKS Matthew | D V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 46 | CROWE Adam D. | D D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 47 | TAE Ryan | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 48 | BHAN Amar | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 49 | WILSON Eric | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 50 | SURESH Rohan | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 51 | SHANNON Jack | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 52 | MELESHKO-PETRAKOV Jonathan | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 52 | MALHOTRA Siddharth | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 54 | SETHI Parth | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.