ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LI Aaron | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 2 | NICOLL William | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 3 | XU Andy P. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
| 3 | WONG Jackson | - | - | 3% | 12% | 29% | 37% | 19% |
| 5 | LIU Derek | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
| 6 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 7 | TANG Terry | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% |
| 8 | UNGERER Roger M. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 6% |
| 9 | MATSAKH Philip | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% |
| 10 | LI Ayren | - | - | 1% | 12% | 44% | 43% | |
| 11 | CULHANE Dechen | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 12 | GHEDINI Luca | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 13% |
| 13 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | - | - | 5% | 26% | 47% | 21% | |
| 14 | SHAPIRO Leon | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 15 | LIU Ryan | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% |
| 16 | GUTH Joseph | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
| 17 | CHENG Ethan | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% |
| 18 | TAN Aidan | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 19 | MILLER Jordan | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 4% |
| 20 | SONG Noel | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
| 21 | GERRISH William | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 21 | WANG Brian | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 23 | AKYAMAC Bora | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 24 | HIGGASON Hugh | - | 6% | 26% | 45% | 21% | 3% | |
| 25 | BRENNEMAN Titus | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 26 | KAPOOR Aayan | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
| 27 | DALBERG Anders | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 28 | ZHAO Adam | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 29 | LEE Eugene | 4% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 30 | CHEN Ethan | - | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 31 | MUNDY Ezra | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% | |
| 32 | LIU Eric | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 33 | WANG Auther | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 18% | |
| 34 | SCHLACK Jake | 6% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 35 | ZHANG Lucas | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 36 | SION Andrew | 2% | 14% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 37 | BOBROW Silas | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 38 | CHUNG Ian | 13% | 40% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | SIMON Luke | 2% | 14% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 40 | LAO Kevin | 5% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 41 | WONG Jacob W. | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 42 | ARUL Girish | 15% | 41% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | BLEIL Tyler | 20% | 44% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | XIE Jicheng | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 45 | BROOKS Matthew | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 46 | CROWE Adam D. | 15% | 49% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | TAE Ryan | 10% | 29% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 48 | BHAN Amar | 34% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 49 | WILSON Eric | 24% | 45% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 50 | SURESH Rohan | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | SHANNON Jack | 42% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 52 | MELESHKO-PETRAKOV Jonathan | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | MALHOTRA Siddharth | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | SETHI Parth | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.