The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

3rd Annual Precision Invitational RJCC

Junior Men's Foil

Saturday, February 12, 2022 at 8:00 AM

Jump Beyond Sports - Torrance, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 GODZHIK Zachary - - - 2% 12% 39% 48%
2 LUH Ethan K. - - 3% 16% 42% 39%
3 JAYASEKARA Hiran H. - - 3% 18% 45% 35%
3 SIU Aiden - 1% 6% 26% 46% 21%
5 MARTIN IV Elmer D. - - 7% 30% 43% 19%
6 LI Avery Peihong - 2% 11% 28% 34% 20% 4%
7 MCCOSH Evin M. 1% 11% 34% 38% 14% 2%
8 GOBBO Alexander - - 5% 20% 38% 30% 6%
9 SADOVSKY Leor B. - - 1% 8% 29% 42% 20%
10 CHENG Nathan - - 1% 6% 25% 43% 24%
11 SEAL Maximus R. 2% 13% 34% 34% 14% 2% -
12 SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. - - 3% 19% 44% 34%
13 CANLAS Nathan - - 4% 23% 45% 27%
14 TSAY Jeremy M. - - 1% 7% 28% 45% 19%
15 GIRALDO Pablo E. - - - 2% 14% 43% 41%
16 CO Dylan 1% 9% 30% 36% 19% 4% -
17 GOLDADE Luke A. - 1% 4% 17% 34% 33% 12%
18 NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. - 1% 9% 31% 43% 16%
19 MORALES Ian N. - 2% 13% 34% 39% 13%
20 KIM Derek A. - 2% 12% 31% 36% 17% 2%
21 TAN Peter 3% 17% 33% 30% 14% 3% -
22 LE Jacob W. - 2% 18% 41% 32% 8%
23 PARK Sky 6% 40% 39% 13% 2% -
24 OH Jaden 5% 28% 41% 22% 4% -
25 KIM Aiden 5% 24% 38% 26% 7% 1%
26 ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) 1% 9% 25% 34% 23% 8% 1%
27 ZHENG zhe - 2% 13% 34% 35% 15% 2%
28 SMITH Grant D. 10% 35% 36% 15% 3% - -
29 DE LA FUENTE Ian 1% 10% 40% 36% 12% 1%
30 PIESNER Zachary C. - 6% 22% 38% 27% 7% 1%
31 WANG Ethan 1% 12% 33% 35% 16% 3% -
32 NGUYEN Liam 2% 21% 39% 28% 9% 1% -
33 LLIDO Soren - 3% 18% 37% 30% 10% 1%
34 MYERS Dean - 10% 33% 36% 17% 3% -
35 MO Jason 1% 6% 24% 38% 25% 6% -
36 PARK Gabriel 8% 29% 37% 20% 5% -
37 LI Matthew 4% 26% 41% 23% 5% -
38 BARTSCH Henry 69% 27% 4% - - -
39 ZHOU Oscar J. - 5% 24% 42% 24% 4%
40 MUSHER Benjamin J. - 1% 5% 19% 34% 31% 11%
41 HARRIS Rhonen 26% 42% 25% 6% 1% -
42 PARK Ryan 21% 54% 22% 3% - -
43 EDISON Ansel 26% 40% 25% 8% 1% - -
44 ALBINALI Eissa 90% 9% - - - - -
45 KIM Jonah 58% 37% 5% - - -
46 DINSAY Kristjan 3% 18% 37% 31% 10% 1%
47 HUANG Alston 54% 36% 9% 1% - -
48 SCHIENEMAN Valentine 41% 42% 15% 2% - - -
49 KHER Roan 2% 18% 41% 30% 8% 1%
50 CHENG Jonathan 5% 22% 35% 26% 10% 2% -
51 CHEN Brian 2% 39% 41% 16% 3% - -
52 GREENEBAUM Oliver 74% 23% 3% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.