Jump Beyond Sports - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GODZHIK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
2 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% | |
3 | JAYASEKARA Hiran H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% | |
3 | SIU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 21% | |
5 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 19% | |
6 | LI Avery Peihong | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 25% | 4% |
7 | MCCOSH Evin M. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 16% | 2% | |
8 | GOBBO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 36% | 6% |
9 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% |
10 | CHENG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% |
11 | SEAL Maximus R. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 2% | - |
12 | SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% | |
13 | CANLAS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 27% | |
14 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 19% |
15 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% |
16 | CO Dylan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 4% | - |
17 | GOLDADE Luke A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 12% |
18 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 16% | |
19 | MORALES Ian N. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 13% | |
20 | KIM Derek A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
21 | TAN Peter | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
22 | LE Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 8% | |
23 | PARK Sky | 100% | 94% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | |
24 | OH Jaden | 100% | 95% | 67% | 26% | 4% | - | |
25 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 7% | 1% | |
26 | ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
27 | ZHENG zhe | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
28 | SMITH Grant D. | 100% | 90% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
29 | DE LA FUENTE Ian | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% | 13% | 1% | |
30 | PIESNER Zachary C. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% | 1% |
31 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - |
32 | NGUYEN Liam | 100% | 98% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
33 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
34 | MYERS Dean | 100% | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - |
35 | MO Jason | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 7% | - |
36 | PARK Gabriel | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | |
37 | LI Matthew | 100% | 96% | 70% | 29% | 5% | - | |
38 | BARTSCH Henry | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | |
39 | ZHOU Oscar J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 29% | 4% | |
40 | MUSHER Benjamin J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 11% |
41 | HARRIS Rhonen | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
42 | PARK Ryan | 100% | 79% | 25% | 3% | - | - | |
43 | EDISON Ansel | 100% | 74% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
44 | ALBINALI Eissa | 100% | 10% | - | - | - | - | - |
45 | KIM Jonah | 100% | 42% | 5% | - | - | - | |
46 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
47 | HUANG Alston | 100% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
48 | SCHIENEMAN Valentine | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
49 | KHER Roan | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
50 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
51 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 98% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
52 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.