Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WESTPHAL David R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 65% |
| 2 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
| 3 | CARRIER Gabriel A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 15% | |
| 3 | STRAUSS Luke | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | |
| 5 | MCDONALD Connor | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 6 | CHRISTENSEN Parker | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 27% | 4% | - |
| 7 | HAWSON Kieran | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 6% | |
| 8 | DANIS Blake M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 9% | |
| 9 | LI Patrick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 33% |
| 10 | BARTLETT Christopher | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 17% | |
| 11 | ZHOU Jiasheng | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
| 12 | GAO Zachary | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 13 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | |
| 14 | MCADOO Declan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 3% |
| 15 | KENT IV David | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | 1% |
| 16 | CHOI Kaiden I. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 17 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 14% | 1% | |
| 18 | KENT Elizabeth J. | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 19 | HARR Carver | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 11% | |
| 20 | DE JONG Titus | 100% | 94% | 64% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 21 | KIM Eugene | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 10% | |
| 22 | KENT V David | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 7% | - |
| 23 | ANDERSON Claire | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 24 | COLE Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 46% | 10% |
| 25 | BURBEY Sam | 100% | 84% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | TORRES Nicolas | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | 20% | 3% | |
| 27 | PETERSON Matthew | 100% | 82% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | PEARSON Heila | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
| 29 | ANDERSON Donald | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | BUERGISSER Kai | 100% | 90% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | BLEICHER Simon | 100% | 97% | 75% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 32 | PEARSON Arwa | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | TOLLEFSEN Zachary | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 34 | ENTWISLE Jacob | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 35 | DENT Gideon | 100% | 90% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | BAS Joaquin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 37 | LEWIS Rachel | 100% | 40% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 38 | BLANCHARD Timothy | 100% | 67% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 39 | REID Wesley | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.