Boston Fencing club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 62% |
2 | GRAHAM Roy J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% |
3 | WU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% |
3 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 48% | 9% |
5 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% |
6 | BING Charles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
7 | MIALL Steven A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 60% | 14% |
8 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 33% | 4% |
9 | LIN Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% | 6% |
10 | ACHILOV Sayid | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 11% |
11 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 17% |
12 | LI Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
13 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 46% |
14 | CHENG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 5% | - |
15 | LI Arvin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | - |
16 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
17 | GUO Sean | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 4% |
18 | PO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 6% |
19 | TANG Terry | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
20 | JIANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 28% |
21 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 19% | 1% |
22 | KOVACS Wyatt | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - |
23 | LIU Derek | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
24 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | 1% |
25 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 15% | 1% |
26 | SONG Noel | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - |
27 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
28 | GONG Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% | 7% |
29 | XU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | 16% | 2% | - |
30 | FAN Xikai | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
31 | SHEN Mingxuan | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
32 | BUCKLEY-JONES Henry C. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
33 | WANG Mason | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
34 | YOON DYLAN | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 7% | - |
35 | KAPOOR Aayan | 100% | 98% | 75% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
36 | SHAO Eric | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - |
37 | GUO Justin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 3% |
38 | LEE Eugene | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
39 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 100% | 86% | 38% | 5% | - | - |
40 | ZHAO Adam | 100% | 94% | 68% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
41 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
42 | ZHENG Harrison | 100% | 84% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
43 | FENG Michael | 100% | 95% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - |
44 | RIPA Joseph K. | 100% | 61% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
45 | LI Ayren | 100% | 98% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - |
46 | GREENLEAF Paul | 100% | 83% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
47 | YU Stephen | 100% | 76% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
48 | WUN Jonathan | 100% | 87% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
49 | GE Daniel | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
50 | XU Ethan | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
51 | WANG Rory | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
52 | ZHAO Brandon | 100% | 55% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
53 | CHANDRAMOHAN Aran | 100% | 71% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
54 | HAZLETT Grady | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
55 | BRATTAIN Trey | 100% | 11% | - | - | - | - | - |
56 | SMITH Liam | 100% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.