Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MUGA Boris | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
2 | LI Brian X | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 43% | |
3 | TODREAS Simon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% |
3 | YAO Shun | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
5 | O'HARA Keegan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 28% |
6 | KAEDING Alexander (Alex) B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
7 | DYER Carson C. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 6% | - |
8 | SMITH Jackson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 33% |
9 | INSLER Ethan C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
9 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 22% |
11 | XIAO Zherui | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 19% | 2% |
12 | KASTENBERG Leo M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 21% | 3% |
13 | WESTMAAS Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
14 | LAWLER Aidan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
15 | CHU Ian | 100% | 100% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
16 | GOLDMAN Rami | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% |
17 | SMAY II Joseph E. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
18 | CHUANG Kenneth H. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
19 | RYAN Christopher | 100% | 92% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - | |
20 | PARCELEWICZ John M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 31% |
21 | WISNIEWSKI Bart | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 4% |
22 | RYAN Seth C. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
23 | HOLDERNESS Landon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 35% | |
24 | BEITTEL David F. | 100% | 97% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - |
25 | FONG Joseph M. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
26 | BURCH Tristan H. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
27 | BARAFF David | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
27 | RHEA Eric L. | 100% | 89% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
29 | YOUNGS Benjamin | 100% | 91% | 55% | 15% | 1% | - | |
30 | WILLIAMS Richard | 100% | 90% | 53% | 15% | 1% | - | |
31 | PARTE Aidan | 100% | 81% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
32 | KIM Dan | 100% | 81% | 31% | 3% | - | - | - |
33 | SCHWARY Irv | 100% | 88% | 50% | 13% | 1% | - | |
34 | SATTERWHITE William W. | 100% | 65% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
35 | CAAMANO Leo P. | 100% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
36 | DYER CJ | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% |
37 | KUHN Jeffrey | 100% | 97% | 67% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
38 | POMPIAN Mark | 100% | 51% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
38 | WEBER Dick | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
40 | LIPTON Michael D. | 100% | 98% | 76% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - |
41 | GRAVIS Martin V. | 100% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.