The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

South Coast RJCC/ROC

Cadet Men's Foil

Saturday, September 24, 2022 at 8:00 AM

Pasadena Convention Center - Pasadena, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 SIU Aiden - - - 2% 22% 76%
2 JAIN Aditya - - - - 3% 26% 72%
3 CANLAS Nathan - - 1% 10% 39% 51%
3 CO Dylan - - - 13% 45% 42%
5 SADOVSKY Leor B. - - - 1% 7% 34% 58%
6 MARTIN IV Elmer D. - - - 1% 9% 39% 51%
7 WANG Ethan - 1% 12% 38% 39% 10%
8 DINSAY Kristjan - 1% 10% 29% 40% 20%
9 ZHENG zhe - 2% 13% 36% 37% 12%
10 MYERS Dean - 1% 9% 35% 42% 14%
11 NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. - - 1% 7% 35% 57%
12 HOSKERI Anik S. - - 4% 21% 45% 31%
13 SISINNI Riccardo - - 6% 25% 43% 25%
14 RASMUSSEN Sage - 6% 26% 40% 23% 4%
15 MA Andrew - - 4% 20% 45% 31%
16 EDISON Ansel 3% 24% 41% 25% 6% 1%
17 SOTO-ULEV Aden A. - - 1% 10% 38% 41% 10%
18 NICOLETTI Luca - 1% 10% 34% 40% 15%
19 GOBBO Alexander - - 2% 15% 44% 39%
20 MUSHER Benjamin J. - 1% 7% 27% 43% 23%
21 OH Jaden - 1% 8% 29% 43% 19%
21 LING Eddie - 1% 11% 36% 42% 10%
23 SMITH Grant D. - 4% 17% 35% 32% 11% 1%
24 LI Matthew - 5% 21% 40% 28% 6%
25 PIESNER Zachary C. - - 4% 36% 46% 14%
26 PARK Ryan 1% 13% 41% 36% 9% -
27 RENTERIA Emiliano - 1% 10% 33% 40% 16%
28 CORTRIGHT Skipper - 2% 14% 34% 36% 13%
29 NGUYEN Liam - - 3% 34% 47% 16%
30 LE Jacob W. - 1% 8% 29% 42% 20%
31 MA Bryant - 5% 22% 38% 27% 7%
32 TULYAG Azim 21% 45% 27% 7% 1% -
33 DERRICK Blake - 3% 18% 41% 33% 5%
34 ZHOU Hao Kai - - 1% 12% 46% 36% 4%
35 WOO Christian - - - 4% 29% 66%
36 LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden - - 4% 22% 46% 28%
37 SHEN Owen - - 1% 8% 41% 44% 7%
38 CORTRIGHT Joshua C. - 1% 5% 21% 39% 29% 5%
39 PARK Steve 1% 10% 32% 39% 15% 2% -
40 RUBIN Max 3% 26% 44% 23% 4% -
41 SETLUR Bhrugu - 7% 28% 42% 20% 3%
42 FUKUDA Diego - 1% 8% 34% 49% 8%
43 PONS Diego - 7% 30% 39% 20% 3%
44 NAVARRO Kato 1% 11% 35% 38% 14% 1%
45 TAN Peter - 6% 30% 43% 19% 2%
46 LAM Nicolas 4% 32% 41% 20% 4% -
47 LE Jacob H. 4% 20% 37% 28% 10% 1% -
48 CHUN Dashel 27% 45% 23% 5% - - -
49 LLIDO Soren - 4% 21% 43% 27% 5%
50 PARK Rion 2% 17% 40% 31% 9% 1%
51 BUTLER Owen 46% 40% 13% 2% - -
52 LI Jett 1% 9% 32% 40% 17% 2%
53 BAEK David - 3% 17% 40% 33% 8%
54 KROVIDI Arush 2% 24% 60% 13% 1% -
55 KIM Daniel Y. 1% 9% 37% 41% 12% 1%
56 SCHIENEMAN Valentine 43% 41% 14% 2% - -
57 YOUNG Owen 4% 23% 40% 26% 6% -
58 FINNEY Lorenz - - 2% 16% 42% 33% 6%
59 GREENEBAUM Oliver 18% 40% 30% 10% 2% - -
60 TUAN Evan - 12% 41% 36% 10% 1%
61 KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. 6% 27% 39% 22% 6% -
62 GORDON William L. 14% 49% 30% 6% - -
63 BORG Matthew 14% 39% 34% 11% 2% -
64 PINCHENG Yao - 5% 20% 36% 29% 9% 1%
65 FANG Jaden 4% 24% 39% 25% 7% 1%
66 YI William - 6% 27% 41% 21% 3%
66 KALAMAS Nikolas 51% 38% 10% 1% - -
68 ZHANG Graham 19% 44% 30% 6% - -
69 BARTSCH Henry 3% 44% 39% 12% 1% -
70 COONAN Seamus 44% 41% 13% 2% - - -
71 PETERSON Lucas 7% 33% 41% 18% 2% - -
72 CHAN Connor 46% 42% 11% 1% - -
73 PARK David 24% 47% 24% 5% - -
74 TSAY Jordan R. 8% 31% 39% 19% 4% -
75 SMITH Jeremiah 2% 16% 37% 33% 11% 1%
76 PARZICK Wade 26% 43% 24% 6% 1% -
77 REICHEL Ezra 7% 37% 40% 14% 2% -
78 LIANG Ethan 32% 54% 14% - - -
79 ZHAN Kevin 3% 21% 42% 29% 5% - -
80 CHANG Nathan 5% 27% 41% 23% 3% - -
81 FLANAGAN Miles 12% 35% 36% 14% 2% - -
82 JIANG Yehong 64% 31% 5% - - -
83 BECKER Ethan 88% 12% 1% - - -
84 DROPKIN Mason 49% 44% 6% - - -
85 ROSE Jacob W. 61% 34% 5% - - -
85 MESERVE Max 1% 10% 31% 38% 18% 2%
87 MONTGOMERY Georgie 36% 45% 16% 2% - -
88 YORK Lucas 21% 41% 28% 9% 1% - -
89 BOYNTON Alex 9% 51% 32% 7% 1% -
90 YUAN Jonathan 6% 41% 41% 10% 1% - -
91 SHORTER David Alexander 62% 32% 5% - - -
92 COLLIGAN Apollo 9% 42% 38% 10% 1% -
93 ORNELAS Matteo 22% 50% 24% 4% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.