Pasadena Convention Center - Pasadena, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | SIU Aiden | V V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
2 | JAIN Aditya | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
3 | CANLAS Nathan | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
3 | CO Dylan | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
5 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
6 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | D V V V V V | V V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
7 | WANG Ethan | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
8 | DINSAY Kristjan | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
9 | ZHENG zhe | V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
10 | MYERS Dean | V V D V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
11 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | D V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
12 | HOSKERI Anik S. | V V D V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
13 | SISINNI Riccardo | V D V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
14 | RASMUSSEN Sage | V V V D D | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
15 | MA Andrew | D V V V D | V V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
16 | EDISON Ansel | V V D D D | V V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
17 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
18 | NICOLETTI Luca | V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
19 | GOBBO Alexander | V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
20 | MUSHER Benjamin J. | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
21 | OH Jaden | V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
21 | LING Eddie | V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
23 | SMITH Grant D. | V V D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
24 | LI Matthew | V V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
25 | PIESNER Zachary C. | V V D V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
26 | PARK Ryan | V V V D V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
27 | RENTERIA Emiliano | V V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
28 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | V V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
29 | NGUYEN Liam | V D V D V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
30 | LE Jacob W. | V D V D V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
31 | MA Bryant | V D V D D | V V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
32 | TULYAG Azim | V D D D V | V V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
33 | DERRICK Blake | V V V V V | D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
34 | ZHOU Hao Kai | V V V D V V | D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
35 | WOO Christian | D V V V V | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 | |
36 | LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden | V V D V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
37 | SHEN Owen | V D V V V D | D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
38 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | V V V V D D | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
39 | PARK Steve | V D V V D V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
40 | RUBIN Max | D V D V V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
41 | SETLUR Bhrugu | V D D V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
42 | FUKUDA Diego | D V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
43 | PONS Diego | D V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
44 | NAVARRO Kato | V V D V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
45 | TAN Peter | V V V D D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
46 | LAM Nicolas | V D V D V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
47 | LE Jacob H. | D D D V V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
48 | CHUN Dashel | V V D D V D | V D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
49 | LLIDO Soren | D D V V D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
50 | PARK Rion | D V V D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
51 | BUTLER Owen | V D D D V | V D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
52 | LI Jett | V D V D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
53 | BAEK David | D V V D D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
54 | KROVIDI Arush | D D V V D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
55 | KIM Daniel Y. | D D D V V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
56 | SCHIENEMAN Valentine | D V D V D | V D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
57 | YOUNG Owen | D D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
58 | FINNEY Lorenz | D D V D V D | V D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
59 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | D V V D D D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
60 | TUAN Evan | D D D V D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
61 | KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. | D D V D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
62 | GORDON William L. | V D D D D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
63 | BORG Matthew | D D V D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
64 | PINCHENG Yao | D D D D V D | V D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
65 | FANG Jaden | V D D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
66 | YI William | D D V V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
66 | KALAMAS Nikolas | D D V V D | D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
68 | ZHANG Graham | D D V V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
69 | BARTSCH Henry | V D D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
70 | COONAN Seamus | D V D D D V | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
71 | PETERSON Lucas | D V D V D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
72 | CHAN Connor | D D V D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
73 | PARK David | D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
74 | TSAY Jordan R. | D V D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
75 | SMITH Jeremiah | D V D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
76 | PARZICK Wade | D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
77 | REICHEL Ezra | V D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
78 | LIANG Ethan | D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
79 | ZHAN Kevin | D D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
80 | CHANG Nathan | D D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
81 | FLANAGAN Miles | D V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
82 | JIANG Yehong | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
83 | BECKER Ethan | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
84 | DROPKIN Mason | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
85 | ROSE Jacob W. | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
85 | MESERVE Max | D D D D D | D | 2.7 | 0 | -2.7 |
87 | MONTGOMERY Georgie | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
88 | YORK Lucas | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
89 | BOYNTON Alex | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
90 | YUAN Jonathan | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
91 | SHORTER David Alexander | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
92 | COLLIGAN Apollo | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
93 | ORNELAS Matteo | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.