Pasadena Convention Center - Pasadena, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KUKVA Taisiya | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 25% |
| 2 | PHUKAN Indra | - | 3% | 20% | 43% | 31% | 4% | |
| 3 | CHANG Celine A. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 3 | WANG Angelina | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 5 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | - | - | 2% | 16% | 46% | 36% | |
| 6 | CHANG Ella | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 7 | YAO Yilin | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 20% |
| 8 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 9 | PINCHUK Meghan | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% | |
| 10 | ENRILE Erica | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 9% | |
| 11 | LI Charlotte | - | 1% | 13% | 37% | 37% | 11% | |
| 12 | HAU Olivia | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 13 | DRYSDALE Lita | - | 2% | 16% | 40% | 34% | 9% | |
| 14 | OPERARIO Abigail Z. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 48% | 29% | |
| 15 | SPOHN Mary S. | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 16 | POON Desiree | 4% | 27% | 42% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 17 | MA Katelyn | - | 5% | 31% | 41% | 19% | 3% | |
| 18 | BROWN Riley | 8% | 34% | 40% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 19 | LIANG Jingjing | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 20 | FILONOVA Alisa | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% |
| 21 | JAMES Ashley | 29% | 56% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 22 | MULAGARI Swarasai | 22% | 45% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 23 | DUONG Zoey | 1% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 13% | 1% | |
| 24 | CHUNG Penelope | 2% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 25 | LEWIS Rachel | 1% | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 26 | FRANEK Lisa | - | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 27 | NEISINGH Isabelle | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 17% | |
| 28 | LAI Amanda | 6% | 30% | 41% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 29 | PRIMES Amanda M. | - | < 1% | 4% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
| 30 | EGENOLF Gabriella | 5% | 32% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 2% | |
| 32 | BENNETT Vienne | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 33 | XU Celina | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 34 | MOHEBI Neeka | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 35 | CHEN Samantha | 56% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 36 | MEDAMPALLI Vedhikaa | 62% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | KIM Isabella | 52% | 41% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | IINO Kennedy | 43% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.