Pasadena Convention Center - Pasadena, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KUKVA Taisiya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% |
| 2 | PHUKAN Indra | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 35% | 4% | |
| 3 | CHANG Celine A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
| 3 | WANG Angelina | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 3% | |
| 5 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 36% | |
| 6 | CHANG Ella | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
| 7 | YAO Yilin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 20% |
| 8 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 9 | PINCHUK Meghan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 47% | |
| 10 | ENRILE Erica | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 9% | |
| 11 | LI Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 11% | |
| 12 | HAU Olivia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 13 | DRYSDALE Lita | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 9% | |
| 14 | OPERARIO Abigail Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 29% | |
| 15 | SPOHN Mary S. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 16 | POON Desiree | 100% | 96% | 69% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 17 | MA Katelyn | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | 23% | 3% | |
| 18 | BROWN Riley | 100% | 92% | 58% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 19 | LIANG Jingjing | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 20 | FILONOVA Alisa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
| 21 | JAMES Ashley | 100% | 71% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 22 | MULAGARI Swarasai | 100% | 78% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 23 | DUONG Zoey | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 14% | 1% | |
| 24 | CHUNG Penelope | 100% | 98% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 25 | LEWIS Rachel | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 26 | FRANEK Lisa | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 27 | NEISINGH Isabelle | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 17% | |
| 28 | LAI Amanda | 100% | 94% | 64% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 29 | PRIMES Amanda M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% | |
| 30 | EGENOLF Gabriella | 100% | 95% | 64% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 2% | |
| 32 | BENNETT Vienne | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 33 | XU Celina | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 34 | MOHEBI Neeka | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 35 | CHEN Samantha | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 36 | MEDAMPALLI Vedhikaa | 100% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | KIM Isabella | 100% | 48% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | IINO Kennedy | 100% | 57% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.