Fencing Academy of Denver - Littleton, CO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LI Patrick | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 25% |
| 2 | MILLER Jeffrey | - | - | - | 8% | 50% | 42% | |
| 3 | CARRIER Gabriel | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 45% | |
| 3 | MCCOWN Ronan | 6% | 28% | 43% | 21% | 3% | ||
| 5 | ALTMAN Jeff | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 51% | |
| 6 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 2% |
| 7 | TORRES Nicolas | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
| 8 | STRAUSS Luke | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 60% | |
| 9 | TOLLEFSEN Zachary | 1% | 12% | 39% | 36% | 11% | 1% | |
| 10 | CHOI Kaiden | - | 5% | 22% | 42% | 28% | 2% | |
| 11 | NIEMIEC Mark | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 43% | 9% | |
| 12 | GAO Zachary | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | |
| 13 | ANDERSON Claire | 24% | 45% | 26% | 5% | - | ||
| 13 | HARR Carver | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | |
| 15 | LEEDER Elizabeth | - | 6% | 33% | 43% | 17% | 2% | |
| 16 | PEARSON Heila | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 17 | KENT David | 1% | 8% | 32% | 41% | 17% | 2% | |
| 18 | SAINT-PHARD Shana | 5% | 31% | 44% | 19% | 1% | - | |
| 19 | .BINCZYK Adam | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 20 | PERKINS-OLLILA Justin | - | 6% | 25% | 44% | 25% | ||
| 21 | PETERSON Matthew | 2% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 22 | MCADOO Declan | 1% | 14% | 40% | 37% | 8% | ||
| 23 | ERKENBECK Nathan | - | - | 5% | 28% | 50% | 16% | |
| 24 | WELCH Bryant | 1% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
| 25 | GAMMILL Luke | 6% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 27 | FUNSTON Lauren | 1% | 12% | 40% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
| 28 | DANIS Blake | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 34% | 7% | |
| 29 | SHULL Marc | 1% | 6% | 27% | 45% | 21% | 1% | |
| 30 | FRENCH Phaelen | 24% | 52% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 31 | RODRIGUES Nicholas | 29% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 32 | MCDONALD Connor | 15% | 49% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | WANG Zoe | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 34 | CARRIER Meredith | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
| 35 | LUTTON Tom | - | < 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 29% | |
| 36 | PEARSON Arwa | 60% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 36 | PERKINS-OLLILA Emily | 39% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 38 | HANEY Kim | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | FOX Alexander | 13% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | ANDERSON Donald | 7% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | SZABO Oliver | 39% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 42 | SKUBIC Wyatt | 13% | 39% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | COLLINS Cavan | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 3% | ||
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.