Remenyik ROC and RJCC

Cadet Men's Foil

Saturday, October 1, 2022 at 2:00 PM

Ryan Fieldhouse - Evanston, IL, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 CULLIVAN Justice - - - - 1% 18% 81%
2 JI Aidan Y. - - - 2% 16% 46% 35%
3 LU Yikai - - - - 2% 19% 79%
3 ZHAO Bowen - 3% 14% 32% 35% 15% 1%
5 MCISAAC Finn - 1% 6% 22% 39% 27% 5%
6 SANTOS Carlos R. - 6% 27% 42% 22% 3%
7 REEVES Liam - - 1% 9% 38% 52%
8 XIAO Bowen - - 6% 31% 42% 18% 2%
9 FLYNN Ian - - - 3% 19% 47% 32%
10 PALMA Matthew Dominic - - 1% 11% 42% 45%
11 CHOE Jayden K. - - 1% 12% 40% 42% 5%
12 GOGOI Vir K. - - - 3% 22% 47% 28%
13 FU Steven 1% 10% 27% 35% 21% 5% -
14 TSAO Lukas - 1% 7% 30% 45% 17%
15 BOYKO Miles - 1% 9% 30% 41% 17% 2%
16 METTE Russell - 3% 18% 41% 32% 6%
17 REAUME Nate 16% 42% 32% 9% 1% -
18 HEYBOER Jason 6% 26% 40% 23% 5% - -
19 KUE Temujin 7% 32% 41% 17% 3% - -
20 NYKAMP Caleb - - 5% 25% 46% 22% 1%
21 VANOYEN Dominick - 6% 31% 42% 19% 2%
22 RIECK Brennan 2% 15% 35% 33% 13% 1%
23 RAJPAL Alastair - 1% 9% 37% 39% 13% 1%
24 OLSON Emerson - 3% 14% 32% 35% 15% 1%
25 WAKEHAM Paul 1% 10% 29% 37% 19% 3% -
26 BARCA Bryant - 5% 24% 43% 23% 4% -
27 WEI Thomas 45% 43% 12% 1% - - -
28 IRVINE Brody 6% 23% 36% 25% 9% 1% -
29 DUNLAP Ian 9% 30% 36% 20% 5% 1% -
30 LOCKWOOD Jacob 10% 38% 39% 11% 1% - -
31 GLOVER George 16% 52% 26% 5% - -
32 BREWNER Ethan 29% 42% 22% 5% 1% - -
33 KOKKER Thomas 3% 20% 42% 29% 6% -
34 HE Tyler 59% 35% 6% - - -
35 WAKEHAM Timothy 16% 44% 32% 7% 1% - -
36 SANDERS Jack 34% 44% 19% 3% - - -
37 HOWLAND Jonas 16% 37% 32% 13% 3% - -
38 WEISS Quintin 29% 44% 22% 4% - -
39 MARK IAN 14% 44% 36% 6% - - -
40 PEAKE Lucas 3% 18% 34% 30% 13% 3% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.