Ryan Fieldhouse - Evanston, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | CULLIVAN Justice | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 2 | JI Aidan Y. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 3 | LU Yikai | D V V V D V | V V V D | 5.8 | 4 | -1.8 |
| 3 | ZHAO Bowen | V D V V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 5 | MCISAAC Finn | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 6 | SANTOS Carlos R. | V V V D V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 7 | REEVES Liam | V D V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 8 | XIAO Bowen | V D D V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 9 | FLYNN Ian | V V V V V V | V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 10 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 11 | CHOE Jayden K. | D V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 12 | GOGOI Vir K. | V V V V V D | V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 13 | FU Steven | V V D V V V | V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 14 | TSAO Lukas | D V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 15 | BOYKO Miles | V V V D D V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 16 | METTE Russell | D D V V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 17 | REAUME Nate | V D V D V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 18 | HEYBOER Jason | V D D D V V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 19 | KUE Temujin | D V V V D D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 20 | NYKAMP Caleb | V D D D V V | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 21 | VANOYEN Dominick | V V D D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 22 | RIECK Brennan | V V D D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 23 | RAJPAL Alastair | D D D D V V | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 24 | OLSON Emerson | D V D D D V | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 25 | WAKEHAM Paul | D D D V V D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 26 | BARCA Bryant | V D D V D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 27 | WEI Thomas | D V V D D D | V D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
| 28 | IRVINE Brody | D D D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 29 | DUNLAP Ian | V D V D D D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 30 | LOCKWOOD Jacob | V D D V D D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 31 | GLOVER George | D D D V D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 32 | BREWNER Ethan | D D V D D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 33 | KOKKER Thomas | D D D V D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 34 | HE Tyler | D V D D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 35 | WAKEHAM Timothy | D D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 36 | SANDERS Jack | V D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 37 | HOWLAND Jonas | D V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 38 | WEISS Quintin | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 39 | MARK IAN | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 40 | PEAKE Lucas | D D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.