Santa Clara, CA - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BANERJEE Anup | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
| 2 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 35% |
| 3 | MURUHIN Yaroslav | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 28% |
| 3 | DIERKS Kian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% | |
| 5 | JEON Caleb A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% |
| 6 | WONG Nicholas A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% |
| 7 | CHUANG Kian J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 8% | |
| 8 | MU Jeffrey | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 9 | LO Conrad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 55% |
| 10 | WANG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 26% | |
| 10 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 18% | |
| 12 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
| 13 | YEE Johnathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 14 | DETERING Julian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 15 | NG Eben S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% | |
| 16 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 23% | |
| 17 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 13% |
| 18 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 39% | |
| 19 | HUANG Kevin D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 48% | 9% | |
| 20 | YU Leo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% |
| 21 | LI Ryan Z. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 22 | WONG Luke S. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 23 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 23% |
| 24 | WHITE Austin M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% | 5% |
| 25 | NG Kenneth | 100% | 89% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | CHOPRA Rohan A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 66% | 22% | 2% | |
| 27 | BAEK David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 45% | 9% | |
| 28 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 15% | |
| 29 | BARTELS Milo | 100% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 30 | SEEDS Edward T. | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
| 31 | WU Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% | 7% |
| 32 | PIESNER Zachary C. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 33 | HUSSAIN Ibrahim | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 16% | 1% | - |
| 34 | TAPUS Alexandru | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 35 | CANLAS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 32% | |
| 36 | LIN Richard | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 37 | WILT Daniel E. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 38 | MA Andrew | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 7% | - |
| 38 | HARRIS Otto | 100% | 83% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | WONG Matthew H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 41 | HE Bu Wei O. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 20% | 2% | - |
| 42 | TEH Ryan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 43 | LEVY Jacob | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | 25% | 3% | |
| 44 | MA Bryant | 100% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 45 | RUBIN Max | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 46 | TAPUS Andrei | 100% | 83% | 34% | 5% | - | - | |
| 47 | SHEN Owen | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 22% | 3% | |
| 48 | ANDERSON Jacob | 100% | 88% | 49% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | LI Jett | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 50 | AIKEN Nicholas A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 22% | 1% |
| 51 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 32% | 5% | - |
| 52 | MAK Osman K. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
| 53 | TUAN Evan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 54 | CHEN Justin K. | 100% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 55 | BUFIY Aeneas | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 56 | GERA Kaveer | 100% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 57 | AMAYA Jared C. | 100% | 65% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 58 | CHIN Ryan | 100% | 84% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 59 | BREEZE Jared | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | ZHANG Luke | 100% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 61 | CRACRAFT John R. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 10% | 1% | |
| 62 | HUSSAIN Ismail A. | 100% | 63% | 17% | 1% | - | - | |
| 63 | JUDSON Colin | 100% | 81% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 64 | FANG Jaden | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 65 | GRAPHIA Gabriel | 100% | 89% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | CHU Colin | 100% | 67% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 67 | CHEN Evan | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 68 | MIN Lucas | 100% | 81% | 18% | 1% | - | - | |
| 68 | SISINNI Riccardo | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 70 | RAINS Jackson T. | 100% | 65% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 71 | ZENG Chuyi | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 72 | LIU William | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.