City Beach Volleyball, Fremont - Fremont, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SISINNI Riccardo | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 72% |
| 2 | NICOLETTI Luca | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 62% |
| 3 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | - | - | 2% | 17% | 47% | 34% | |
| 3 | WU Alber Y. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 45% | 32% | 6% |
| 5 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | - | - | - | 2% | 18% | 48% | 32% |
| 6 | LING Eddie | - | - | - | - | 3% | 29% | 68% |
| 7 | MORROW Brenden | - | - | - | - | 7% | 52% | 41% |
| 8 | DINSAY Kristjan | - | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 80% |
| 9 | RASMUSSEN Sage | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% | |
| 10 | TONKOVICH Ryan | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 16% | |
| 11 | FANG Jaden | - | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 44% | 9% |
| 12 | YANG Charles | - | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 39% | 9% |
| 13 | TULYAG Azim | - | 10% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 2% | |
| 14 | LIU William | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% | 1% |
| 15 | LAM Nicolas | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 4% | |
| 16 | GORDON William L. | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 17 | DERRICK Blake | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 51% | |
| 18 | ZHANG Graham | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 3% |
| 19 | RAUTUREAU Hugo | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
| 20 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 21 | RAUTUREAU Arthur | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 22 | ZHONG Maxwell | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 23 | HIRAMOTO Satoshi | - | 1% | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
| 24 | CHANG Jonathan | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 14% | 1% |
| 25 | WONG Evan | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 6% | |
| 26 | WU Lucas | - | - | 3% | 19% | 48% | 30% | |
| 27 | CHAN Joseph | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 28 | TOYOFUKU Ethan | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 29 | KIM Daniel Y. | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 11% | |
| 30 | LI Richard | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 31 | PORPORA Oliver | 7% | 39% | 39% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | DENG David | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 33 | FUKUDA Brando | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 34 | LO Preston | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% | |
| 35 | PARK William | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
| 36 | SAH Steven | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 37 | KIM Andrew | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 38 | WONG Braxton | - | - | - | 3% | 14% | 39% | 44% |
| 39 | ONG Nicholas | 2% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 40 | HE Bourne | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 41 | PARK Rion | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | |
| 42 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | 1% | 10% | 34% | 40% | 14% | 2% | |
| 43 | BIELER Mason | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 44 | CHANG Nathan | 1% | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 45 | DULAI Angad | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 29% | 2% |
| 46 | AGRAWAL Niki | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
| 47 | TSAY Jordan R. | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 6% | |
| 48 | CHUN Dashel | 2% | 33% | 41% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 49 | ZHAN Kevin | 4% | 22% | 41% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
| 50 | ZHOU Ryan | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 51 | FU Bryan | 25% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | KIM Jonah | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% | - |
| 53 | PETROV Mikhail | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 54 | DULAI Agam | 7% | 32% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 55 | LEE Daniel | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | DEJOURNETT Jacob | 12% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 57 | DANIEL Nikith | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 58 | ARCARA Evan | 61% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 59 | YUE Jackson | 2% | 21% | 43% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 59 | UPENDER West | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
| 61 | WILLEY Emerson | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 62 | ZHANG Max | 31% | 45% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 63 | LUK Trusten | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 64 | CHEN Owen | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 65 | WONG Jayden | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 66 | WU Thomas | 1% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 67 | LIANG Ethan | 19% | 46% | 28% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 68 | WANG Brian Z. | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 69 | LEHTINEN Axel | 22% | 45% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 70 | KULKARNI Karan | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 71 | PEZESHKI Oliver | 34% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 72 | CHEN David | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 73 | SHIH Henry | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 7% | - |
| 74 | BANUELOS Dario | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 75 | KREISHER Ilan | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 75 | BOYNTON Alex | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 77 | ZHU Randy | 87% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 78 | BHARDWAJ Ranbir | 2% | 27% | 44% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 79 | PAGE Hudson | 28% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.