Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HU Oliver W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 2 | KIM Nicholas W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% | |
| 3 | WU Wesley E. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 3 | PELOSKY Ryan F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% | |
| 5 | KASI Sanjay | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
| 6 | KIM Tei D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 48% | 9% |
| 7 | SHI Shenzhi | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 8 | OURSLER Jack | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 14% | |
| 9 | CANDESCU Cristian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | |
| 10 | ANDREWS Nathan J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 21% | |
| 11 | LOCKWOOD Owen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% |
| 12 | VANNI Filippo A. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 13 | CHENG Thomas C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% | |
| 13 | BATRAK Alexander | 100% | 98% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 15 | BLUTT Emerson B. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 12% | |
| 16 | BALL James T. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 17 | LUTAR Lucas N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% |
| 18 | XIAO Leon (Ruibo) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
| 19 | LEE Daniel C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 20 | YU Vinni | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% |
| 21 | MCGOFF Jose I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% | |
| 22 | HO Ryan J. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
| 23 | LIU Kevin B. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 24 | CARMAN Ian K. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 4% | |
| 25 | JANG Jaewon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 18% | |
| 26 | REGE Advaith | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 5% | |
| 27 | SLEDESKI Andrew | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 28% | 4% | |
| 28 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 4% | |
| 29 | LIAO Alex J. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 30 | DING Allan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
| 31 | SIEGEL Elliot | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 32 | ZHANG Henry C. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% | |
| 33 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 34 | BRODERICK Padraig | 100% | 31% | 3% | < 1% | - | - | - |
| 35 | GEE Brandon | 100% | 99% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
| 36 | PYO Michael M. | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | MILLER Trent D. | 100% | 83% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 6% | 1% | |
| 39 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 7% | |
| 40 | DING Jonathan | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 41 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 95% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 42 | MARSHALL Ian | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 6% | |
| 43 | KWON Ethan | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 44 | SACCOCCIO Nicholas P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 45 | WU Jerry | 100% | 90% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | MANGE Nathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 47 | CHAN Tyler | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 48 | FRITZ Ayden R. | 100% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | MEYERS Lee P. | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 50 | OZSOLAK Alex | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 51 | BAE Kevin | 100% | 86% | 50% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 52 | SPOSATO Luke B. | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 53 | IVARSSON Oliver | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | SANTULLI Tristan | 100% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 55 | BELLUOMO David C. | 100% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 56 | BAMSEY Connor G. | 100% | 66% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 56 | ZHAO Jesse | 100% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.