Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | XIAO Leon (Ruibo) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% |
2 | KASI Sanjay | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 20% | |
3 | LIU Eric P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 23% |
3 | LOCKWOOD Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 28% |
5 | REGE Advaith | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 9% |
6 | SACCOCCIO Nicholas P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% |
7 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% |
8 | WU Jerry | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
9 | HERGERT Benito | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 12% | |
10 | MA Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% |
11 | DALBERG Leif | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | 15% | 2% | |
12 | LEE Daniel C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 31% | |
13 | ZHANG Henry C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% |
14 | CHENG Thomas C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% |
15 | DAI Jonathan T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
16 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 31% | |
17 | MATHEWS Rocco J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 9% | 1% |
18 | BAS Liam | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
19 | KIM Tei D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% |
20 | JANG Jaewon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | |
21 | KIM Yonjae | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 8% | |
22 | WEINKOPF William O. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 3% |
23 | DENYSE Jameson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
24 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 16% |
25 | HAN Lawrence | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
26 | GEE Brandon | 100% | 100% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
27 | FU Samuel Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 16% | |
28 | FEDONCHIK Henry J. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - |
29 | SELENDY Maximilian (Max) A. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - |
30 | HU Robin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
31 | IVARSSON Oliver | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
32 | TORRES Treston | 100% | 85% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | |
33 | YU Vinni | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 44% |
34 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 38% | 8% |
35 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 24% | 3% |
36 | MONTALVO-ZOTTER Gabriel M. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - |
37 | MACRAE Harrison A. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
38 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 17% | |
39 | SHIKHMAN Robert | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 22% | 3% | |
40 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 12% | |
41 | BREIER Matthew F. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
42 | GALLUCCI Charles John | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
43 | PICARD Justin | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
44 | SHA Yi Peng | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 9% | 1% | |
45 | MARSHALL Ian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 13% | |
46 | OZSOLAK Alex | 100% | 96% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - | |
47 | FU Yifan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
48 | BING Charles | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
49 | LEE Aidan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 13% | 1% |
50 | BALL James T. | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
51 | WANG Jonathan | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
52 | SANTULLI Tristan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
53 | OUYANG Matt J. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
54 | WERWA Griffith | 100% | 87% | 33% | 5% | - | - | |
55 | WANG Gerald Y. | 100% | 70% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
56 | WALOR Owen T. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
57 | HUTTENBACH Koren A. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
58 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
59 | BAE Kevin | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
60 | BRODERICK Padraig | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
60 | PAN Eric | 100% | 88% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
62 | BOYLE Aiden P. | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
63 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 100% | 41% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
65 | GORDON Sasha | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
66 | ARANA Massimo | 100% | 85% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
67 | KUO Oliver K. | 100% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | |
68 | QI Steve | 100% | 70% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
69 | WANG Alex L. | 100% | 81% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
70 | DONG Haoxiang | 100% | 75% | 28% | 3% | - | - | |
71 | ZHONG Guoren | 100% | 88% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
72 | JONES Taajuddin | 100% | 31% | 3% | - | - | - | |
73 | ZHANG Shenghong | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.