Sunnyvale, CA - Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZILINSKIY Eduard | - | - | - | - | 1% | 15% | 84% |
2 | MANDOKI Sandor I. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 39% | 45% |
3 | ARIETA Ryan T. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% | |
3 | SHAMIS Mark | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% | |
5 | KHAYAT Ziad N. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 38% | 53% |
6 | SALLEMBIEN Nicolas H. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
7 | SHARMA Sanil | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 6% | |
8 | NG Alexander M. | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
9 | NGUYEN Ethan D. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% |
10 | IVE Isaac L. | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% | |
11 | HELGE James R. | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% | |
12 | LEVY Zachari I. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 34% | 10% |
13 | CAI Kevin P. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 4% |
14 | WISOFF Jeffrey | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
15 | WANG Nathan | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | |
16 | DESSAUER Tobyn M. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 5% |
17 | LIN Ryan | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 27% |
18 | CHIEN Brandon | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% | |
19 | LOGUE Ethan D. | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | |
20 | MENEGOLI Lorenzo | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 41% | 27% | |
21 | SHACKLEFORD Aidan J. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 41% | 11% |
22 | GARRETT Samuel | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
23 | ZHOU Alec Q. | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
24 | CAO Tianxing | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - | |
25 | VAN EIKEMA HOMMES Neil B. | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
26 | LIANG Aaron | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% |
27 | KULIGOWSKI Bartosz | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
28 | CHON Joshua | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
29 | DESOUZA Hansel S. | - | 4% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% | - |
30 | YULE Alexander L. | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
31 | KUO Elvin | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | |
32 | SIVAGAR Leo | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
33 | MARIANI Lou | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 46% | 23% |
34 | WONG Nathan | 6% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
35 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
36 | LOUIE Jason | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
37 | KIM Benjamin I. | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
38 | RAJPAL Sartaj S. | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 32% | 6% | |
39 | POPOVICI Andrew E. | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
40 | MA Victor | 5% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
41 | WEAVER Neil | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
42 | DUONG Enoch | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 1% |
43 | KONCHENKO Andrey | - | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
44 | PALACIOS Justin M. | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - | |
45 | LIU Bobby P. | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
46 | DORRELL Connor I. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
47 | AU Marcus J. | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
48 | YAO Shun | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
48 | JOSEPH Abey | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
50 | PARK Elliot | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | |
51 | KOERBER Christopher T. | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - | |
52 | MAENG Jake W. | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
53 | SCRIBNER Aidan C. | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
54 | JUNG Alexander | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
55 | ZIEBART Jeremy J. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | - |
56 | NGUYEN Steven | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
57 | WEINGARTEN Solomon (Sol) | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | |
58 | LEVITSKY Jonathan | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | |
59 | DIECK Logan O. | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
60 | LIPTON Michael D. | 9% | 38% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
61 | ZANKOWSKI Brendan | 52% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
62 | BARRY Dominick | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
63 | LIU Benjamin | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
64 | KOH Tommy | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
65 | ELANGO SriVaaikuntesh | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | |
66 | ANDERSON Elias W. | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
67 | LEE Trevor | 44% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
68 | HASAN Raamis | 28% | 46% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
69 | HAINES Reagan | 23% | 48% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
70 | WRIGHT Christopher | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | |
71 | STENNIS Brendan | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
72 | XIONG Zejun | 13% | 36% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
73 | MILEY Nick N. | 17% | 40% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
74 | GNERRE Sante | 3% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
75 | BAGCHI Aritra | 1% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
76 | ATHAVALE Pranav | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
77 | PETERSON Elliot F. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | - |
78 | OLANDER Gabriel | 15% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.