The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SISINNI Riccardo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 35% |
2 | MA Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 16% |
3 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% |
3 | DETERING Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% |
5 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 13% |
6 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
7 | DERRICK Blake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 19% |
8 | TUAN Evan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
9 | LING Eddie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 17% |
10 | MORROW Brenden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
11 | LI Jett | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
12 | PARK Sky | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 4% |
13 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 9% |
14 | SMITH Grant D. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
15 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 21% | 2% |
16 | LO Preston | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 2% |
17 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 14% |
18 | MYERS Dean | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
19 | PINCHENG Yao | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
20 | ANDERSON Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
21 | NG Kenneth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% |
22 | LAM Nicolas | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
23 | AIKEN Nicholas A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
24 | NICOLETTI Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
25 | WU Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
26 | HARRIS Otto | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
27 | BAEK David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 9% |
28 | SAH Steven | 100% | 96% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
29 | KIM Daniel Y. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
30 | TONKOVICH Ryan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
31 | REICHEL Ezra | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
32 | PARK Rion | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 32% | 6% | - |
33 | LIU William | 100% | 98% | 75% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
33 | WONG Evan | 100% | 100% | 91% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - |
35 | NGAI Julian | 100% | 100% | 90% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - |
36 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
37 | LIU Felix | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
38 | TEH Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
39 | KIM Jonah | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
40 | AGRAWAL Niki | 100% | 99% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
41 | BOUCHARD Kai | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
42 | YEE Johnathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
43 | PETERSON Lucas | 100% | 84% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - |
44 | GORDON William L. | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
45 | KALAMAS Nikolas | 100% | 96% | 64% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
46 | EDISON Ansel | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
46 | JIANG Yehong | 100% | 91% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
46 | LUI Justin | 100% | 38% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
49 | ZHANG Graham | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
50 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
51 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | 100% | 96% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
52 | CHAN Connor | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
53 | LEHTINEN Axel | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
54 | LIANG Ethan | 100% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
55 | BOYNTON Alex | 100% | 10% | - | - | - | - | - |
56 | COONAN Seamus | 100% | 37% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.