Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KAMBESELES Peter G. | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
| 2 | CANDREVA Hunter R. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 3 | MARAKOV Allen B. | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 38% | 11% | |
| 3 | ROGAK Benjamin A. | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | |
| 5 | KANG Michael H. | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 36% |
| 6 | POLKOVSKY Dylan S. | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 7 | PAVLENISHVILI David G. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% | |
| 8 | SLAVINSKIY Alan | - | - | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% | |
| 9 | PAOLINI Nathan R. | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | |
| 10 | HOLST Eric | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
| 11 | MOTIR Lucas D. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | |
| 12 | SHENG Patrick Y. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 13 | PLECHAVICIUS Daniel | 37% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
| 14 | ZHANG Matthew | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 15 | RODELL Hunter C. | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 16 | LEVY Jeffrey M. | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
| 17 | HAO Jerry | - | - | 6% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 3% |
| 18 | KIM Juni C. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% | |
| 19 | ANDREEV Arthur | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 21% | |
| 20 | RITCHIE Patrick Q. | 10% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 21 | KAMBESELES Jack M. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
| 22 | KOKENGE Clark | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 14% | |
| 23 | HANXU Richard A. | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 35% | 14% |
| 24 | INSLER Gabriel C. | - | - | 4% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
| 25 | DOLGONOS Mark | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% | |
| 26 | SMITH Nicholas S. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | |
| 27 | KIM William M. | 18% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | BORATIN Daniel I. | 2% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
| 29 | CHAUDHRY Rafay | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% | |
| 30 | KRENZ Michal A. | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | ROSEBORO Brian R. | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% | |
| 32 | BAKER Kevin G. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 33 | GIBSON Nowell L. | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 34 | MAAS Sean H. | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 35 | MOYSE Alexander S. | 10% | 39% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 36 | LUKANYUK Lorence | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
| 37 | DIAS-LALCACA Kieran P. | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 38 | ELAMURUGAN Kavin | - | 4% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 39 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 40 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. | - | 2% | 17% | 41% | 33% | 8% | |
| 41 | NOSSA Alec | 15% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | WANG William M. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 43 | BANKULLA Nihal R. | 14% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 43 | PARK Brian | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 45 | KUMAR Anitya | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 46 | SOOMRO Adam A. | 1% | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 1% | |
| 47 | CHEUNG Liyan | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% | |
| 48 | AWWAD Basel | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 49 | ZHU Jasper | 43% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 51 | HU Matthew | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 51 | LIU Frank | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | BEYRICH Henry J. | 13% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 54 | MATINHO Jameson | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | CHEN Austin | 37% | 46% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
| 56 | INSLER Ethan C. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | |
| 57 | SPANO Gideon S. | 8% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.