Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | KAMBESELES Peter G. | D V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
2 | CANDREVA Hunter R. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.1 | 6 | +2.9 |
3 | MARAKOV Allen B. | V V V V D | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
3 | ROGAK Benjamin A. | V D V V V | V V V V D | 1.5 | 4 | +2.5 |
5 | KANG Michael H. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
6 | POLKOVSKY Dylan S. | V V V V V | V V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
7 | PAVLENISHVILI David G. | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
8 | SLAVINSKIY Alan | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
9 | PAOLINI Nathan R. | V V V V D | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
10 | HOLST Eric | D V V V D | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
11 | MOTIR Lucas D. | D V D V V | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
12 | SHENG Patrick Y. | V D D V D V | V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
13 | PLECHAVICIUS Daniel | D D D V V | V V D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
14 | ZHANG Matthew | V D D D D | V V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
15 | RODELL Hunter C. | D D V D D | V V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
16 | LEVY Jeffrey M. | D D D V D | V V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
17 | HAO Jerry | V V V V V V | D | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
18 | KIM Juni C. | V V V V V | D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
19 | ANDREEV Arthur | V V V D V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
20 | RITCHIE Patrick Q. | V V D V V | V D | 1.7 | 4 | +2.3 |
21 | KAMBESELES Jack M. | V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
22 | KOKENGE Clark | D V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
23 | HANXU Richard A. | D V D V V V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
24 | INSLER Gabriel C. | D D V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
25 | DOLGONOS Mark | V D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
26 | SMITH Nicholas S. | V D V D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
27 | KIM William M. | D V V D V | V D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
28 | BORATIN Daniel I. | V D V V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
29 | CHAUDHRY Rafay | V V D D D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
30 | KRENZ Michal A. | V D D V D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
31 | ROSEBORO Brian R. | V D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
32 | BAKER Kevin G. | V D V D D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
33 | GIBSON Nowell L. | V V D D V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
34 | MAAS Sean H. | V V V V D D | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
35 | MOYSE Alexander S. | V V D V D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
36 | LUKANYUK Lorence | D V V V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
37 | DIAS-LALCACA Kieran P. | V D V D D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
38 | ELAMURUGAN Kavin | D D V V D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
39 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | D D D V V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
40 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. | V D D V D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
41 | NOSSA Alec | D V D D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
42 | WANG William M. | D D D V V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
43 | BANKULLA Nihal R. | D D D V D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
43 | PARK Brian | V V D D D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
45 | KUMAR Anitya | D V D D D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
46 | SOOMRO Adam A. | D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
47 | CHEUNG Liyan | D D V D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
48 | AWWAD Basel | D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
49 | ZHU Jasper | D D D D V D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
51 | HU Matthew | D D V D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
51 | LIU Frank | V D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
53 | BEYRICH Henry J. | D V D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
54 | MATINHO Jameson | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
55 | CHEN Austin | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
56 | INSLER Ethan C. | D D D D D | D | 2.7 | 0 | -2.7 |
57 | SPANO Gideon S. | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.