Louisville, KY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LICHTEN Keith H. | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 53% | 26% |
2 | MAKMATOV Vadim | - | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
3 | WILKINSON Derek H. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
3 | BUCKLEY Michael | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% | |
5 | FRANK Fred | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
6 | MECHKOV Iliya | - | - | - | - | 5% | 28% | 67% |
7 | STOCK Jordan | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
8 | ROSTAL Scott E. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
9 | GAINES Aaron | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
10 | LEE Tobias (Toby) T. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 22% |
11 | BARTLETT Jonathan R. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
12 | SANTA MARIA Carlos A. | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% | |
13 | GATES Darcy C. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
14 | CHENG Thomas | - | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 38% | 20% |
15 | MASE James B. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
16 | RUSKIN David I. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
17 | SCALES Chad | - | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
18 | KENT Dwain | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
19 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% |
20 | HUDSON Jeffrey (Jeff) A. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% | |
20 | CRANOR Erich L. | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 33% | 7% | |
22 | BALLARD Mark V. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
23 | EVANS Allen L. | 2% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
24 | SIMMONS Matthew C. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 1% |
25 | O'DOWD Andrew J. | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
26 | BARREIRO Darren | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
27 | LIOU Solomon | 1% | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
28 | MEHALL Michael | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 36% | 8% | |
29 | WHEELER Mark C. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
30 | CHOI Paul S. | - | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 7% |
31 | HENZLER Thomas A. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
32 | MAYCHROWITZ Matt | 1% | 8% | 22% | 31% | 25% | 11% | 2% |
33 | ARROWSMITH II Alan M. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% |
34 | ROOD Alex | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
35 | FOLEY Kevin | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
36 | HARRELL D. Fox | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
37 | RESS Michael A. | - | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
37 | SANCHEZ Leon D. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
39 | NEWSOME James L. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
39 | MENDOZA Zandro | 2% | 14% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
41 | GERACI Paul A. | 2% | 10% | 25% | 31% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
42 | GUMAGAY Paul | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
43 | KALAPASEV Nenad (Ned) (Ned) S. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
44 | KROGH Daniel (Dan) M. | 1% | 9% | 23% | 31% | 24% | 10% | 2% |
45 | CAFASSO martin | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
46 | PHO Eric | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
47 | LUO Aaron | 5% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 13% | 3% | - |
48 | POPOKH Leo | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
49 | STEWART Robert | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
50 | CAMPBELL Alex | 1% | 6% | 18% | 31% | 28% | 14% | 3% |
51 | SPRINGER Michael | 2% | 10% | 25% | 31% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
52 | MARSHALL William L. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
53 | SCHINDLER Sergey M. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
54 | ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
55 | KIM Jeff | 15% | 34% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
56 | BOLDUC PATRICE | 9% | 28% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | |
57 | NEALE James H. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
58 | MAZZOLI Julio C. | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% | |
59 | VARNEY John R. | - | 4% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 6% | |
59 | LOEFFLER Carl E. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% | |
61 | CLINEFELTER Dennis S. | - | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
62 | DICKSON Tim | 3% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
63 | MARKOWITZ William M. | 5% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
64 | DILLE Brice | 2% | 14% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
65 | SCOTT George R. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 30% | 10% | |
66 | BAXTER Daniel J. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% | |
67 | KLINE R. Jay | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
68 | PENGELLY Neil | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
69 | WAGMAN Robert S. | - | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
70 | DOWNEY Gerard C. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
71 | HUGHES Michael D. | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
72 | PATTERSON Malcolm (Werewolf) D. | 9% | 34% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - | |
73 | KLEIN Johannes | 22% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
74 | WEINGARTEN Solomon (Sol) | 14% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - | |
75 | EDWARDS Tim | 15% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
76 | THOMAS Jr. Robert D. | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
77 | KRUGER Mark | 16% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
78 | LINGVAY Laurance (Larry) S. | 2% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
79 | LIPTON Michael D. | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
80 | BLAKLEY Dwain | 1% | 6% | 18% | 30% | 28% | 14% | 3% |
81 | SPAHN Jeff | 1% | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - |
81 | LOCASALE Nicholas A. | 9% | 34% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
83 | SWANSON Dave | 2% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
84 | BECK Brian C. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
85 | GILLESPIE Jeremy W. | 16% | 53% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
86 | OZANNE Jeffrey S. | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
86 | DAVIS Andrew | 5% | 26% | 41% | 22% | 5% | - | |
88 | HESS Marc F. | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
89 | FLINT James E. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
89 | LANDIS Geoffrey A. | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
91 | GAUVEY Ken C. | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
92 | GROSS Louis A. | 12% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
93 | REID Michael | 11% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
94 | RIFKIND Neil | 47% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
95 | MEHALL Michael | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
96 | TIERNEY Luke | 7% | 41% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
96 | SIMS Martin L. | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
98 | REED David | 45% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
99 | SATTERWHITE William W. | 59% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
100 | GRAVIS Martin V. | 65% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
100 | DAVIS Kelly | 59% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.