Louisville, KY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KALKINA Yelena | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 48% |
| 2 | DENNER Jasmina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% | |
| 3 | ALTMAN Leigh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 33% | 4% |
| 3 | ZHANG Lynn Y. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 23% | 3% | |
| 5 | SIERRA Kate | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% | |
| 6 | BERMAN Frauke | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 20% | |
| 7 | RUNYAN Heidi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% |
| 8 | YANG Jenny J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 34% | 6% | |
| 9 | KING Robin E. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 20% | 3% | |
| 10 | EYRE Jane E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% | |
| 11 | DUNN Linda J. J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% | |
| 12 | ENOCHS Liz | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 40% | 8% | |
| 13 | DEMING Clare L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 35% | 5% |
| 14 | SHINN-CUNNINGHAM Barbara | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% | |
| 15 | OBLONSKY Natalia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 18% | |
| 16 | CHANCO-EVERETT Aileen | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 17 | JOHNSON Laura S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% | 15% |
| 18 | VANCE Beth S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 18% | |
| 19 | CHIARELLI Elisabet | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 32% | |
| 20 | RANDALL Cathleen Coyle | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 11% | 1% |
| 21 | LUM Karen | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% | 1% | |
| 22 | STARR Cynthia (Cindy) H. | 100% | 99% | 80% | 35% | 7% | - | |
| 23 | TURNER Delia M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 26% | |
| 24 | WILSON Dawn J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 74% | 31% | 5% | |
| 25 | OISHI Yoko | 100% | 98% | 66% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 26 | DAHL Naomi V. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 27 | WU Yik Chun | 100% | 74% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
| 28 | DUDNICK Shannon | 100% | 98% | 60% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | SHAFER Genine | 100% | 72% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | JEAN Emmanuelle C. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 31 | MAUL Judy L. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 32 | PREIMESBERGER Elaine | 100% | 59% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 33 | WEBB Maud | 100% | 84% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | DEBERTIN Beth | 100% | 79% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 35 | FOLEY Eileen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 19% | |
| 36 | GLUCK Myriam | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% | |
| 37 | FREYRE Rebecca R. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 38 | HILD Ranjani | 100% | 91% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | JOHNSON Pamela | 100% | 84% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | PEIN Annette | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 19% | 2% | - |
| 41 | SCHLIENGER Katia | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 5% | |
| 42 | KIM Nam Heui | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 43% | 5% | |
| 43 | THORNTON Eva | 100% | 96% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 44 | WALTER Joanne | 100% | 90% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 45 | HIRSCH Lauren | 100% | 68% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 46 | MARSH Lisa | 100% | 38% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 46 | MUNGOVAN Elizabeth | 100% | 67% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 48 | CONNOLLY Grace | 100% | 11% | - | - | - | - | |
| 49 | MORO Diana | 100% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 50 | MASLEN Cheryl L. | 100% | 43% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.