Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center - Miami, FL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | GUO Jessica Zi Jia | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 2 | KOO Rachel A. | V V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 3 | KIM Rachael | V V V V D | V V V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 3 | MAK Tinney | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 5 | LAM Justina | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 6 | TALAVERA Daena | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 7 | MASSICK Laine | V D D V V | V V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 8 | TUCKER ALARCON Ariadna C. | V V D D V | V V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 9 | HORSLEY Asherah | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
| 10 | JING Alexandra | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 11 | SLOWINSKI Maia A. | D V V V V | V V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 12 | APELIAN Katherine | D V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 13 | ZHENG Ivy | V D V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 14 | JING Emily | V V V D V D | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 15 | BOODELL Ella | V V V V D D | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 16 | LEE Allison (Allie) | V D V D V | V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 17 | BAROCHIA Meera | V V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 18 | RASO Sofia G. | V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 19 | SERBAN Samantha M. | V D V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 20 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | V V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 21 | SCHATZ Kristina J. | V V D V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 22 | YE Eileen | V V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 23 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | V D V V V | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 24 | ZHENG Vivian | V V D D V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 25 | KAGANOVICH Katerina S. | V V D V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 26 | PAPADAKIS Lily | V V V V D D | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 27 | CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. | V V V D D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 28 | SHEN Annabel | V V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 29 | HALL Velma | D D V V D V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 30 | VONA Elena M. | D V V D V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 31 | LUNG Katerina | V D V D D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 32 | PO Edith | D D V D V V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 33 | CHUNG Rachel J. | D D V V V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 34 | LEE Montana | V D D V V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 35 | DAVIA Daniella V. | D V D V D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 36 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | D D V D V V | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 37 | PALMER Meredith K. | V D D V V D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 38 | CHO Lorin Y. | D V V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 39 | CAPLIN Harriet R. | D D D V V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 39 | HOLLE Aviella S. | D V V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 41 | HAN Jaewon(Leah) | D V V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 42 | HU Allison C. | D V D D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 43 | D'ORAZIO Sofia V. | D V D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 44 | CHEN Kelly | D V D D D V | D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
| 45 | BAKER-ROSENBERG Raynor S. | D D D V D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 46 | LAM Victoria M. | D D D D V V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 47 | SHAW Kayla M. | D D D D V | D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 48 | XU Christine | D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 49 | LING Michelle | V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 50 | APELIAN Gabriella G. | D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 51 | LONG Madeline M. | V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 52 | RASO Olivia | D D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 53 | ABD-ELMONIEM Nusayba K. | D D D D V D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 54 | KOROTCOVA Anastasia | V D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 57 | RENTON Samantha | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 57 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 57 | LIN Emma | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 60 | LA VALLEY Paloma | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 61 | CHO Claire E. | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 62 | HECKMANN Emma | D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
| 63 | SHEN Sophia | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 64 | WERBACH Esther | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.